|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giobillo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giobillo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica SL2-S Pros: Overall quality, viewfinder, shutter button, really effective stabilization, high iso usability, M and third-party optical use Cons: Improveable ergonomics, lack of sensor cleaning, a little more resolution Opinion: Thanks to a high level of madness and the possibility of zero-rate financing, with a "resolute soul" I sold some material that I no longer used and, considering the price close to that of a used M10, stabilization and possibility of adapting objectives already in my possession, I took it. Holding it, excellent feeling of grip and balance, front button to enlarge the viewfinder very comfortable but upper keys difficult to reach and, in general, for me that I have medium-small hands maybe some curves in the handle would have improved the ergonomics without distorting the design. Sweatshirt shot, stratospheric viewfinder, very effective stabilizer. Use with Novoflex adaptor with Elmarit 24mm asph M optics, lux 50 asph, cron apo 90 asph. I don't know how they would have gone on the SL1 but they're fine here and I find them very usable. Also tried briefly with MC21 and Canon EF optics hooks well with 16 35 4is, 24 1.4 II, 35 1.4 Sigma art, it struggles a little to hook with 24 105, 100 macro is, 100 400 II and longer focals with 70 200 4 is. In general however slow but precise maf, very usable with static or slow subjects. Amazing iso seal, use with opening priority, limit time 1/60, variable sensitivity and I find it usable up to 16/25000 iso (obviously depends on what you want to achieve) maintaining detail, color capacity and file workability. Beautiful grain but you have to accentuate it by increasing sharpening and contrast. A little more resolution perhaps would have been optimal (30/36 mp?). Satisfied with the purchase aimed above all, as I have already pointed out, at the use of the M optics of my m6 ... the attraction to digital m never took me despite having tried an m8 (asph, body thickness, shooting noise)... availability of stabilization and relatively "affordable" price did the rest. I find it advisable for those who have the same needs as a photoadamator, excellent for image quality and shooting pleasure, grade 9.5 sent on January 24, 2021 |
 | Voigtlander E 21mm f/3.5 Color-Skopar Aspherical Pros: Light, compact, optical quality and general construction, minimum focus distance, not "stretch" edges Cons: LENS cap Unbearable! Opinion: Purchased to match it to the Zeiss 35/2.8 to have the maximum lightness and compactness to keep in your pocket during "light photographic trips" or during mountain excursions. The lack of autofocus is not a problem even in low ambient light thanks to the magnification in the viewfinder and the pleasant smoothness of the focus ring. Sharp at the center already at TA, improves at the edges by closing a couple of diaphragms. Slightly more "knead" than the Zeiss 16/35 F4 a TA, closing the diaphragm the difference is attenuated almost to cancel. Always compared to the aforementioned zoom-which I own-has more saturated colors, greater resistance to internal reflexes and less lateral chromatic aberration. In my opinion it is a particularly advisable lens for those who prefer light and compact fixed optics to use during travel and/or excursion, street and reportage. According to the reviews on the net The Loxia 21 2.8 is better for landscape use, however at a price and with a double weight. Rated 9 sent on December 04, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
