|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gefry www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gefry ![]() |
![]() | Venus Laowa FF II 10mm f/2.8 AF Pros: Angle of view, materials. Cons: Cost, obscene lens hood that vignettes, distortions at the edges, not very sharp up close, bad autofocus. Opinion: Given the excellent initial reviews found on the net....I thought....it was much better. It gives a feeling of solidity and of having been built with care, a smooth and comfortable focus ring given the generous dimensions of the same. The autofocus is really BAD, from a distance with a 10 mm it is not needed but it is with close-up subjects that you discover its limits and a thousand hesitations, in the end the only solution was to enlarge the subject in the monitor and focus manually. THE SHAMEFUL LENS HOOD....never removed, then I realize that it cartoons fearfully, I take it off and try to put it back on but it doesn't change anything, it exerted much more pressure and I try again a couple of times and in the end the vignette disappears, everything is fine? Not really....the next day here is the cartooning again... solved by removing a useless lens hood (which, however, serves a bit as a possible protection from involuntary impacts). It's still a fun optics Would I take it back? Probably NOT but I have it and I use it Hi Gerry (For the umpteenth time it is proven that all these reviews that are found on YouTube by people who should be professionals....leave the time they find) sent on July 21, 2024 |
![]() | Nikon Z 24-50mm f/4-6.3 Pros: Small, lightweight, economical Cons: I do not like the optics that extend, photographing directly the sun at the top forms a chessboard, colored refraction extremely annoying and difficult to remove in post production. Opinion: I was looking for a minimal, light, space-saving optics and the answer was this optics. It has only one major flaw in my opinion... I often love to include the sun in landscape or flower photos, I like backlight combined with the sun's rays that form with closed diaphragms. Too bad that in addition to the rays forms a chessboard of colored dots, I attributed it to the scarcity of the quality of the lenses to keep the price low but I noticed the same problem even with the much more expensive 17-28 f2.8 I do not understand why no one mentions this defect .... is not that I was alone to photograph the sun directly? ? sent on August 12, 2023 |
![]() | Nikon Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Pros: Compact, relatively light, space-saving Cons: Photographing the sun directly with closed apertures you have beautiful rays, too bad that at the top literally forms a chessboard of light refracted color from red to green / blue Opinion: The 14-24 f2.8 was another thing but it was so bulky that I always left it at home .... after years I decided to replace it with this that I find very convenient to carry around and is always f2.8Too bad for the problem of refraction photographing the sun directly However I highly recommend it. I had also evaluated there 14-30 f4 but I do not like the objectives that "lengthen" sent on August 12, 2023 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me