|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Enrico Parigi www.juzaphoto.com/p/EnricoParigi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: quality of the files, even at high ISO, resolution and workability of files, the center AF point precise and sensitive Cons: points af lens side, with species as targets with low light, slow burst, setting improvement. Opinion: I kept the above for 3 years accompanied by a 7d, and solid quality, exceptional files, workable and excellent performance at high ISO, a car recommended for portrait or landscape and weddings, shooting in the church without flash! excellent recovery of the highlights less than the shadow that occur after the second stop banding evident and difficult to remove, large, bright viewfinder but to improve coverage is about 80% ..... rnmacchina straconsigliata for uttto unless sport and nature, even if cmq does not go quite badly sent on October 10, 2012 |
 | Canon EF 500mm f/4.5 L USM Pros: Light weight, optical quality, autofocus speed, resistance to flare Cons: lack stabilizer, difficulties in finding spare parts if it breaks. Opinion: I have very little to this point, but you will immediately notice its large optical quality, lightweight, can be used freehand but lacks the stabilizer so the task requires more attention. AF is a chip limiter and the MAF is even more. can not recommend this light! as long as you find it at a great price, parts are hard to find. if I could go back I would do it hands down ... AF confirm that the kenko pro 300 DGX continues to function and the quality and speed is affected insignificantly in ..... sent on July 03, 2012 |
 | Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Sharpest at room temperature, multiplied crisp, sealed, compatible with Canon multipliers, resistant paint, autofocus lightning, bokeh ... Cons: weighs a bit, but is well balanced ... I do not know that other defects find him, maybe the lack of a metal hood ... Opinion: The sigma 120-300 os ultimately is a great goal, its only flaw is the weight of 2900g of "goodness in olive oil," is certainly not a featherweight, but it is easily usable by hand as it is very well balanced, has a large image quality combined with an effective stabilizer, an 'opening of F 2.8, 300 mm focal multipliable up to 600mm while maintaining the autofocus, the practicality of the zoom with the quality of a disk. The bokeh is stratospheric .... A little reflection on the motor focus, very fast on a par with that of the canon, with 2x multiplier to the eye settles a little less fast 100-400 L Is Usm smooth before possessed. The stabilizer does his duty, but not by the merits because they are expert in doing comparisons, I can only say that the stabilizers between canon and sigma seem equal. sent on November 14, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Great versatility, sharpness from 100 to 300 mm, autofocus, price, weight. Cons: a little soft at 400 mm, dim, stabilization, quality bokeh. Opinion: I love this goal, it is great especially for the low weight that allows you to carry it easily, draft dated but still very good from 100mm to 300mm at room temperature is 400 you have to close to 1-2 stop. The well-known pump system is invaluable for stalking, but for other types of "hunting" does not go so well, such as from the shed and tripod, the stabilizer of the first generation, which is still very valid, should be disabled and makes you make only one stop .... Recommended! will not regret your purchase. sent on September 26, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
