|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Effeabiio www.juzaphoto.com/p/Effeabiio  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: size, weight, image quality, image stabilization, screen, building, park lenses. Cons: ring secondary pulsed play fn1 and placed in position improved. activation sensor with digital viewfinder "shot too." Opinion: Owner of a 5d mark II, tired of bring on the "rump" too much weight and bulk, I buy the 'om-d ... fantastic body, light and compact, full of buttons (for a mirrorless), built in magnesium and also weather sealed! The menus are less aesthetic and clear of nikon and canon but feature-rich, the stabilization is effective, if we count the advantage of always stabilized mount optical lenses consist of groups less complicated and even cheaper ... does not seem bad! The display less detail than some competitors, made amends in terms of convenience, that is, with the ability to focus and snap directly on it being touch, and is also more overhead. AF good level of speed and accuracy even in low light (comparable to that phase of many reflex) but your self-interest is very dynamic photos with subjects ... forget the 'om-d! Coming to the point, the quality of 'image of the kit om-d + 12-50 compared to my 5d II + 24-105 and absolutely comparable, although less expensive optics and a smaller sensor I find that olympus has more optical quality and range dynamic, and has made a big step forward with respect to the noise, not even comparable to the full frame but certainly compared to the aps-c. Make sure to read the various reviews like digital camera, etc. all photographers ... is even really worth spending so much $ $ $ for a full frame + optical?? sent on July 19, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
