RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Antonioccp
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Antonioccp



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Antonioccp


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

industar_50-2_50_f3-5Industar 50-2 50mm f/3.5

Pros: Small size and low weight, good optical quality, low cost.

Cons: Ergonomics, impossible to mount hood, not very bright at TA.

Opinion: The Industar-50-2 is a 50 mm focal length lens with very small dimensions, manufactured by Russian KMZ until the 1990s. The M42 version, produced for Zenit SLR cameras, was based on the Carl Zeiss Tessar scheme and derived from its predecessor, the Industar 50, available only for M39 screw mounting, for rangefinder cameras. It's a very small and light lens, to be kept comfortably in your pocket, to be pulled out on occasion, to take good pictures in terms of clarity, contrast and colors. It is available in the vintage market for only 20-30 euros, but the negligible expense must not make you think you have badly spent those few resources. As for the negative points, they are essentially: ergonomics, flare and low light at TA. Setting up the diaphragm is difficult because you risk moving the MAF at the same time. Moreover, since it is not possible to mount a lens hood, under certain conditions of the angle of the light source it is subject to flare phenomena. Myevaluation is however satisfactory, especially if compared to the cost of the problem. rn

sent on December 08, 2017


samyang_8fisheye_f3-5iiSamyang 8mm f/3.5 UMC Fish-eye CS II

Pros: Low cost. Good mechanical construction. Excellent with openings f / 5.6 ef / 8. Very useful for indoor photos.

Cons: Made a little disappointing at TA.

Opinion: It's a cheap fisheye, but it returns a good image quality, to the point of considering it, without a doubt, an excellent purchase. It's worth what it costs, if you think that to get better, you have to spend a lot, but more, and also, that this type of focal does not take much time, so allocate substantial resources is not always be good and right . It has a good sharp output already at f / 5.6 and behaves well up to f / 11. A TA disappoint a little 'for clarity and CA. In my opinion, the use on Canon APS-C (crop factor 1.6) is the most apt combination with the others, such as Nikon and Pentax, where the distortion is more marked. I do not recommend using it on FF, where you could use it without a hood, even if risky. It is an optic with manual MAF, but this does not have to worry much, because with the ring on infinity, focuses from 0.60 cm to infinity. Great for taking pictures indoors, but not only. rn

sent on December 06, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me