|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Simone Paglialonga www.juzaphoto.com/p/SimonePaglialonga  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r III Pros: AF, File Quality, Body, Battery Life Cons: Menu (you know), maybe viewfinder Opinion: I have this machine for a few months, passed by Fuji and Canon before. I think it was my worst experience in the study phase and knowledge of the menu (which basically is the step to do to get to know the machine). Let's say that after customizing the controls and my menu and understanding the various main functions regarding the AF and the shutter I reached a comfort-zone and I can take advantage of the machine more than pleasantly. Undoubtedly Canon and Fuji offer an experience from this point of view, more streamlined and intuitive. For the rest the body is really robust with the controls positioned in the right place. The sensor guarantees an excellent file, manageable and pleasant to develop. Actually the very large file, on high volumes, requires a pc of a certain level. I am satisfied with the possibility of taking advantage of equipment of which targets, flash and accessories, of third parties. Perhaps I would change it for an A9 for the presence of the additional ring for the rest I would call it DEFINITIVE. sent on August 25, 2021 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Focal length, value for money, quality optics Cons: Not to tropical hood plasticky. Opinion: Clear and obvious that having the ability to have a range of focal pushed so is already a positive note as with 1100 Euros you get a chance to go to 600mm and still maintain a satisfactory quality and sharpness. That said it is clear that the defects found leave the time they are giving way to positive notes. Not photographer birdlife why not resent particolarmete an AF clearly not comparable to the optical L-series and they definitely are a notch ahead. It has a super telephoto who maintains good size (though in a backpack space for him is located) and quality in terms of sharpness respectable. The weight is, of course, and the elements that make it so affordable there are: there is a specific bag and the hood, comparing the tonnage lens that transmits solidity, is really embarrassing for plasticosità. Again, however, it turns a blind eye volentieri.rnPatisco lack tropicalization but thisProbably meant that he no longer a great Tamron thousand euro, but a Tamron 1700 Euros, maybe have a hood Iron, a purse and other convenient particolari.rnCapisco those who criticize the limiter to 15 meters, however, depends on ... 'use of photographs that he must fare.rnNe are satisfied. sent on March 18, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
