|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Angelux www.juzaphoto.com/p/Angelux  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Character, Autofocus, Used price, sharpness from f1.8 onwards. Cons: Exaggerated and disturbing AC at TA. Difficult to manage at TA Opinion: Beautiful lens at a general level, if you know what you have in your hand it gives you amazing results, with a very particular and very pleasant character. On the autofocus speech, it must be said that it works very well in cross-shaped points, in those only horizontal or vertical it always makes cilecca. So mounted on an old entry level gives a lot of trouble and makes you hate. I use it on 6d only with center point and on 70d on all points and it works which is a wonder. I don't like the 1200d at all. For portraits from foreground to half-length gives beautiful rows. You have to be careful in the exterior to the strongly illuminated subjects creates an exaggerated chromatic aberration at full opening. Addictive when you learn to use it sent on October 08, 2022 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: ISO seal, min exposure time settable (finally), af AI SERVO and ONE SHOT programmable change with the button usually dedicated to depth of field, price, robustness, double ring, illuminated upper display, fairly responsive AF, display defined to sufficiemza, wifi and the related app (camera connect if I remember correctly) that allows resizing to 1920x 1080 directly in download, breackating in a single shot, the 17 mm becomes a real wide angle (great for shots inside I no longer have to take steps back), settings that can be persolized with C1 and C2 (but if you change setting eg aperture as soon as you deactivate the screen for the automatic stanby when switched on returns to the initial setting), very comfortable upper buttons, convenient joypad to set the few points of maf (but be careful they move easily with the giancia), Precise and reliable AF even with the 50 1.4 up to 2.5-3 meters away, image reproduction with the possibility of choosing whether to see the af points that have been activated for that shot and the default zoom level at the pressure of the lens, battery (easily exceeds 500 shots), burst (4.5 fps for me are more than enough), silezioso shooting and silent burst, Hdr in the car, vignetting correction and chromatic aberration in the car, micro-adjustment lenses and buttons partly sufficiently customizable. Cons: Dimensions and weights (for me too exaggerated), lack of built-in flash (it may seem like a crack but on some occasions it is very useful) lithium yongnuo flash not working in live view (I repeat dolo in live wiev), AF less responsive in the dark, weight and my menu limited to 4 or 5 items. Opinion: For me who come from a 1200d the jump was crazy and the first 2 pros I mentioned were enough for me to make the jump (finally I can shoot even at home at 1/125s and +16000 ISO without flash with unattainable results for an APSC. Obviously not having other higher-end machines the characteristics of this machine left me really satisfied. After 170 and + reviews this can only confirm what others have already written. I wanted to make a small remark about the lock button: someone complains about accidental activation, but it is customizable so it can also be deactivated, the app connected with the wifi nn exports the raw (or at least I did not succeed) and does not export for folders as in my old app. The wifi setting is difficult at the beginning and the machine underexposes about one stop (easily solved with exposure compensation) Better than any APSC? in my opinion yes. Only the weight is making me think about switching to an RP with RF 50 1.8 and rf 24-105 4-7.1 RATING 9.0 for me. sent on September 18, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Sharpness, build quality, smooth dials, no barrel coming in and out during the zummate, no rotation during the maf, lightness, price, fast and precise safe maf, fixed f4. Cons: Sharpness, lack of is, difficult to resell it except giving it away, huge original lampshade, with time and a little practice you fall in love with it. Opinion: It's been about a year since I've been looking for this lens since I'm a fan and it took me a while to get a clear idea of the potential of this goal. Permuted with a canon 50 1.4 that on my eos 1200d gave problems of precision of maf while on the 6dii of bought went a bomb, I was immediately amazed amazed at the construction quality of the L series. Coming home I do a few f4 shots inside and I realize that as sharpness is not so much better than my 18-55 and moreover it is not even stabilized, I try to lift the flash integrated in the machine and I notice that from 17 to 24-25 mm of focal is cast a shadow of the same lens on the image, from there another bad surprise. I try to resell it immediately, given the bitterness in the mouth left, but after about 6 months of negotiations tests carried out on the field and attempts to permute with other objectivists it seems that this 17 40 does not please anyone and still remains in my kit. So I'm going to buy a sled flash (a fully manual lithium yongnuo but that makes you forget about the battery problem) and start playing it a little bit. Bammmm, surprise, the photos took another turn, the difference in niness with 18 55 are net, and from there I start to cheer me up. I continue to play it even during the day, I take it to sea, in the mountains, even during wet days and to my surprise does not miss a shot, maf always precise and fast enough, the lens does not behave very well even under 40 degrees of the beach and dials are still new as well as when I bought Obviously to reach a sharp appreciable at least for me you have to close at least to f5.6. At the end of the story I decided to keep this optics and not to sell it because of its reliability, nn misses a shot even on my small 1200d. Just to complete the picture, I use the reflex to take photos in the family and the 17mm l I chose for the interior that on apsc I find them quite wide and I never felt the need to drop below 17. Finally using this 17 40 on apsc nn I notice no excessive distortion problem neither of vignette nor loss of sharpness at the edges. For those who want to have a reliable, light and low-priced optics to replace at 18 55 I highly recommend it. sent on August 19, 2020 |
 | Canon 1200D Pros: Beautiful, light, handy, functional, essential controls to take a photo, excellent video quality even in low light conditions, indicated for a newit. Cons: Lack of connection for an external microphone, lcd screen with few pixels (acceptable compromise given the price) lacks the micro adjustment AF Opinion: sent on June 10, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
