|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Grievas www.juzaphoto.com/p/Grievas ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: Price / quality ratio - Sharpness - to speed - the speed zoom - Focal hike - resale value (if you sell) - The optimal allocation (tripod ring and semi-rigid bag) Cons: Is a bit 'dated, it's true .. But it works benernPesornPoco bright, but you can not expect the mondornPossibile dirty all'internornL'usato has unrealistic prices. Only 200/300euro waste from new. If you buy a drain Opinion: Many people compare him to the Sigma 150-500. Fools. I got them both and there is NO comparison possible between the two. The canon is slightly smaller, weighs half as much, has a much higher quality of construction, the bayonet no wobbles (which, however, often make the sigma), the af is much faster and more precise, the range of focal length 100 -400 is much more usable 150-500.rnrnChe say .. for some time, I used a 70-200 f4 smooth with pride. Small, light and sharp. Now I purchased the 100-400 and I'm loving it. Compared to the 70-200 is slightly less crisp and sharp, but much faster as making fuoco.rnrnIl zoom system pump did not convince me at all, however once you try it I discovered that it is a bomb. If you think about it, the ring is great when you have an excursion to focus not too exaggerated, or to make a quick transition from the smallest to the largest focal length it takes two full turns (as with sigma 150-500). With questo the system instead you can go from 100 to 400 in a fraction of secondo.rnrnChe say: if you do not have money for super telephoto from 6000 € + and you want a zoom lens, the 100-400 is the standard for voi.rnMolti ago propose to use the 70-200 f2.8 and duplicate it. The question is: why spend € 2,000 and € 500 lens multiplier (then multiply by a 200 seems ridiculous to me) when the half brought home this toy? RnrnResto available for any clarification :) sent on February 07, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me