|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
4rdo www.juzaphoto.com/p/4rdo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 80D Pros: Fast both in writing and in AF, good coupling even in poor light, a couple of new useful options, stands up well against the light Cons: Missing the joystick, just soft keys still, silent snap little quiet and indistinguishable from normal in LV, START / STOP button unresponsive Opinion: I'm not good at writing reviews, having had the 60D 70D (sold that had one year) especially with the 70 I never had a good relationship, bought for second best (or one or 7dmk2) for birds I found suffered terribly slow both in writing and in low-light where I think it was even worse than the 60D despite having the same center point in EV, I can say that the 80D here satisfies me is reactive on the right dark, the write speed is really another planet, I have a 85 mB Transcend SDHC U3 / s (write) the same that I used with the 70 and the difference is abysmal * until the card arrives to be almost saturated then the performance collapse * .L 'SERVO AF all in all you dingitoso (with all 45 pt little actually), you have to live with it a little bit, sometimes leaves you amazed sometimes half volley goes out of focus, perhaps with a firmware update can improve it a little. The customization of the keys is the usual (slightlybetter but a nothing) policy that Canon does not let you set the keys as you would like, you know what it costs to do so, the menus have been repainted, but honestly were not those problems to be solved, the 'ISO car has been improved sharply (or so it seems) than before, convenient that you can set a minimum shutter speed in AV. In short, the Canon has patched most of the problems in an honest way without overdoing it as usual sent on July 08, 2016 |
 | Canon EOS M Pros: The price performance ratio, especially with the 22 f2 is a great deal at the end of the M costs less than a compact, solid construction Cons: The 'AF is wrong, the slowness has been patched with the Fw 2:02 but its efficiency remains unsatisfactory, they keys are too few, and those that are poorly managed, missing accessories but mostly lacking goals! Opinion: My opinion on this machine and although having given a negative 6, the problem is that it seems thrown out of a car just to say "hey even the Canon has a mirrorless" but it was not at all convinced of what I was doing, the problems of AF and its slowness have been solved with the FW 2 (normal ... it has become a lightning war) less than 9 months later and did not solve the problem that too often, the camera just can not focus. rnIl form factor chosen by Canon then leave things as they are, if you want to make an ultra-compact car since at least the accessories to make it adaptable in situations where compactness is not needed so much, but no, he did so with the Nikon J1 with the new additional grip (better than nothing) rnDi an electronic viewfinder even in pensarcirnAlmeno optics, there is the classic 18-55 is not bad, 22 is gorgeous .... and a 11-22 anonymous ... the end ... 18 months 3 optics, a large supporto.rnParliamo then of 'STM? An engine made for the video, too bad it's the 22 that 40 are washing rumoree nothing for lightning to focus light not ottimale.rnrnMa what I find really incredible is the apparent lack of intelligence on the part of 'R & D of the Canon (which spends $ 20m in research), already on the machine, there are a few keys vengno and also wasted, I speak of the button for video recording in "photo" remains without function and no possibility to program it as you please, on my old SX210IS can be programmed at will .... AND NO M rnrnHo preferred to sell it immediately as long as I lose "little" because I stink machine "dead" coming evil sent on December 16, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
