Reviews written by Nadir84

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nadir84
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nadir84

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Nadir84

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 500mm f/4 L IS II USM

Pros: Excellent sharpness, microcontrast that leaves you speechless, exceptional extender rendering.

Cons: Absolutely none

Opinion: I took this lens after almost 1 year of testing and research. I tried the 400 f2.8 I series, the 500 f4 Is, the 600 f4 2nd series etc. Then suddenly he comes. Before shooting I take it in hand and I already realize the advantage in terms of weight on the brothers mentioned above. At the first smooth shot I am speechless. I think I can say that it is absolutely among the sharpest lenses ever produced by Canon. With the extender it does not lose anything such as quality and operating speed. I also use it for photo hunting sessions helping me with a monopod. Extraordinary lens

sent on August 18, 2022

Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG EX HSM

Pros: high sharpness in certain focal, very good in others, incredible contrast and colors, with the multiplier 1.4 sigma quality remains excellent, solidity.

Cons: High weight, the absence of a stabilizer.

Opinion: I was undecided on that optical tele take after using for a long time the Canon 70-300 is usm to be mounted on the newly arrived Canon 70D. rnVolevo a zoom that would do justice and that possibly not fall below the 300mm. rnAvevo identified the 100-400 and classical style that is now used at a very low price, or the 70-300 L series with very mixed opinions. rnPer via indecision was stalling and was considering the 70-200 f4 it is necessary to multiply (because dl lightweight transportability and fantastic optical yield) rnPoi I stumbled into SIGMA 100-300 F4 HSM that sincerely not considered own. rnVisto the attractive price I wanted to try. rnrnBhè after the test was love. As merits has a sharpness impossible to find for optical at this price, fast focusing (but not Lightning-fast) and a color rendering which I personally prefer to that of the Canon 70-300 L rnUniche flaws are weight and asenza of the stabilizer. rnrnComunque I surprised by the optical performance of the tests I did with my friend and I possessor of 70-300 Lsay that it is absurd as held blow at all focal .... indeed some even higher 135mm 200mm and 250mm being only inferior to 100mm and 300mm. I also tried the 70-200 f4 is not well here except to 100mm was still there as quality rather than 200mm higher. rnrnrnHo tried to multiply 1.4 and becomes a real war machine, only problem no monopod becomes really difficult to use: too heavy and long.

sent on November 19, 2015