|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fabio De Rossi www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioDeRossi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Focal length, VR, autofocus, decent optical quality Cons: Construction of conception by optical kit, so very plasticky. Opinion: Purchased as optical battle from behind have always left me amazed by the optical quality that does not differ (according to my opinion modestissimissimo) from that of the much more expensive nikon 16-85. For the rest, no frills perspective with a good VR, a good AF and a focal length very apt. It distorts a bit at 18mm and robust construction certainly was not charged for this product. My copy was beautiful older and suffered from spontaneous elongation of zooming when it was tilted down. sent on September 20, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Lightweight, value for money, focus, brightness Cons: Autofocus, the focus ring does not specify Opinion: E 'was my first fixed lens and its quality can not be discussed. Bright, light (you're in your pocket ready for action), unfocused outstanding, excellent sharpness. I have used it mainly for street (although the angle of view corresponding to 52.2 mm did not excite me) or some environmental portrait. Plasticky to the touch but then for the price I can not ask for more, instead af few times I saw him a little uncertain, especially in TA; also the ring of focus right, I never liked it. It remains, however, a perspective that should not be missing in the kit to anyone. sent on September 20, 2014 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Constant aperture of 2.8, sharpness even at room temperature, weight and overall dimensions, value for money. Cons: AF slow and inpreciso Opinion: Sold the 16-85 I bought this lens, which opened me to the world of optics fixed aperture. Although plasticky to the touch with a sense of compactness and robustness (at least for me) fits well as a weight to all APSC SLR balancing well with the body. I did shots at RT in low light conditions with my D3100 and I have always pulled great shots well defined. The lack of VC is negligible in my opinion having regard to the range of focal lengths; range that is well matched by the report, to the street, and saw its 17 mm you can make some nice scenery. The aperture 2.8 still allows you to get nice soft blurred necessary. Excellent value for money. Optics sold only in favor of the Sigma 18-35 Art sent on September 19, 2014 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Focal length, auto focus, sharpness, color rendition, build quality, VR. Cons: The price of both the new but also the used, the maximum aperture, optical quality that does not depart too much from some younger brothers from kits but they cost 3 times less. Opinion: E 'was my first zoom lens after the 18-55 kit. The improvement was more than sensitive, I've photographed in the rain, the cold, damp and optics has always emerged beautifully. The focal length is comparable as the angle of view to that of a 24-127 in the full format, then by all that is needed for the photographer reportage, travel, street; 16 mm and then they all feel. The autofocus is fast and accurate even in non-perfect brightness as well as the VR is effective, I took to the maximum focal length with a very long time (I think 15.1) with substantial results. The only flaws are the brightness; joined to a camera body like the D3000 where to raise the ISO over 800 is deleterious unfortunately often the lens in question is too dark. Also in use by portrait we say that you can not get a cut of the subject from the background due to the too small aperture. Another flaw in my opinion the worse the price of this lens is on the backis on second. Very often overestimated. sent on September 18, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
