Reviews written by Leonardo Iannuzzo

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Leonardo Iannuzzo
www.juzaphoto.com/p/LeonardoIannuzzo

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Leonardo Iannuzzo

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

Pros: good resolution. Economic. tolerates the backlight well. pleasant bokeh.

Cons: I'd like to find other similar optics at similar prices.

Opinion: I bought this optics because I read the MTF tests and I didn't think they could be true. I have to say I was wrong. it looks like I'm doing a review at Canon but it's not. I loved it. it's versatile and performing. sharp enough. little perspective distortion. for about 100 euros you could not have hoped for better. doesn't suffer from the backlight. honestly, if I could find other optics of this class that are equally performing but of different optical lengths I would buy them right away.

sent on October 28, 2019

Canon EOS RP

Pros: great value for money. good resolution. good yield. accurate graphic detail.

Cons: low availability of dedicated optics except at exorbitant prices.

Opinion: I bought a Canon EOS RP out of curiosity. I had good quality Canon goals and I wanted to see what came out of it. the result was excellent and unexpected. even with FD manual optics. This machine has a sensor with a good resolution capability. there is a ratio of the size of the single physical sensor signal detection element to the potential resolution of the optics. in this case it is optimal. to use machines with more solving sensors you need to spend a fortune on optics. not just buy a car. you have to invest 2-3 times the price of the machine in optics. and pay close attention to the actual and physical ability to solve the objectives in optical solvency. having a very high-performance machine in resolution and using it with a non-performing lens means detecting an optical defect and a lack of detail that produce images of very poor quality. it's light. the menu is well organized. the touch screen may or may not like it. it's convenient. but I prefer to turn it off because you risk changing something during sealing by tapping the screen with your nose or fingers. now on the market begin to find adaptors for optics of various brands for which the range of use begins to widen.

sent on October 06, 2019