|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Albyfoto www.juzaphoto.com/p/Albyfoto  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R Pros: Optical quality. Cons: Ring diaphragms can rotate accidentally, not light, creates independence .. Opinion: It 'was my second optical after returning to Fuji, what about a few cons, a lens really successful. A little 'softness to F1.2 but perfectly usable, is after a blade .. Good Bokeh and contrast. Now is perpetually attached to the X-E2 for the photos to the ambient light in the ceremonies. Purchase that would do it with your eyes closed .. sent on March 18, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm X30 Pros: Optical Quality / Sensor / Construction, battery life slightly higher than previous models. Cons: If we want the weight and size do not own pocket .. Opinion: Taken because, as fond of trains, did not want to bring my kit that I use in other areas, I was amazed as surrender ... I do not regret leaving home makes the X-T1 ... As speed and controls, we are almost at the Like an X-E2. L 'autonomy has increased slightly over the old model, even if it remains on 350-400 shots per max .. Iso usable up to 1600 (800 for the more picky). The construction is solid and the weight is felt (to be a compact course). Good level of optical performance and brightness of the same. Manual zoom then I prefer it to electric, more manageable in my opinion .. The advice to those who want a compact quality that does not regret too l 'use of Reflex. sent on January 21, 2015 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Dimensions / weight, yield sensor. Cons: Battery life, poor optics park. Opinion: I took the A6000 after having a Micro Kit 4: 3, Fuji XE-1 and 2, Nex-6 ... I 've taken more than anything else to use for all those outputs read, where the Canon 6D stays at home. . I was a little skeptical on the sensor still denser than the Nex-6 .. I have changed my mind! From what I've noticed the noise of the old Nex to 1600 ISO here it is in 3200 ... Really good job by Sony! White balance improved, with good operating speed AF at the top of the class .. There are still cons: battery life, AF in low light still a little slow, park poor optics for now if you do not use adapters .. sent on September 08, 2014 |
 | Pentax Q Pros: Construction, interchangeable lenses and good quality, ability to have fun with many optical adapters and crop factor. Cons: Battery life, decent sensitivity up to ISO 400. Opinion: Small, impeccable construction in short a pretty compact! I l 'I got it when out and it cost a blunder ... And perhaps it was this that prevented a good disclosure .. The iso up to 400 are well managed, if you exceed the quality begins to decay. The AF is quite fast and precise optics fun and good quality .. A beautiful compact camera, luggage, is really everywhere! Due to the crop factor of about 5.5 x and adapters for almost all optical offers a very good chance of fun. At the current price and nn let it escape! sent on June 24, 2013 |
 | Pentax K-5 II Pros: Ergonomics, Construction, Noise, Full specifications. Cons: TTL flash exposure, lack of choice lenses side original paintings. Opinion: I bought this machine about 1 month and I am satisfied. Perfect ergonomics, complete functions and good operating speed. Sensor management and noise among the heads of APSC (before I had a Fuji X-E1 ..). L 'only flaw is the' flash exposure PTTL that provides results a little erratic, I prefer to use the old Metz with automatic apertures .. It 'also very quiet .. I would say the quality / price ratio is very favorable! sent on June 01, 2013 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: Lightness, construction, quality files, image stabilization system. Cons: Battery life, operating speed good but room for improvement, addictive :) Opinion: With today I bought my second OMD ... For years, Oly was the true extent of my photographic mind (what little I have ..), tired of the rumors that have made me switch from the 4:3 to other brands, either because driven by the beats of the companions of photos you want desire for change, in the end I always found myself back on Olympus. With the birth of the Micro and subsequent growth, the company is committed and issued a 'good car that looks good at all with its rivals ... Body robust and waterproof, operating speed fine (although improved), held at high iso (exploitable at least until 2500) and image stabilization system among the best ... Last but not least, the quality of some otiche that allow you to the peaceful use of the same in the field of vocational (goals tilt apart and photo hunting penalized for now ..). I sincerely hope that Olympus continues to churn out products like this! Super recommended. sent on May 04, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Compactness, Tropicalized, Af. Cons: For now, anyone .. Opinion: Bought at the same time the WCO, I use it to duplicate the old slides (where I also use a 22 without much trouble ..) and also for the Still Life / Macro. The speed and precision of 'Af is great, from 2.8 already' good results, compactness and low weight super .. It 'also tropicalized as the body of the OMD. It 'a good buy, considering the price is not too excessive for an original optical. Highly recommended. sent on April 08, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: Weight, quality TA, price. Cons: Light Purple Fringing. Opinion: Objective compact and lightweight, has a nice yield even F1, 8. L 'only flaw is a slight Purple Fringing which however is seen only slightly in magnification to 100% (fussiness) and easily correctable. It 'a lens that should not be missing in a kit MFT, both for the size you want for the price (ridiculous for the quality it offers), want to surrender .. Highly recommended! sent on February 23, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
