|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Natlov www.juzaphoto.com/p/Natlov  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 17-55mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Sharpness at TA; Precise AF; Color rendering; exceptional hold in backlighting..zero flare (I underline that it has no fluorite lenses or anti-reflection treatment). Cons: Price? (diepende, I do not use it in a professional way ... if I used it ... with rain or something else I would say that the price would be adequate) Opinion: I have owned it for about 3 years; I made about 2500 shots; I mount it on D7100; even with fast moving subjects do not miss a shot (goes into difficulty, but not always, with subjects in strong approach, or removal, with the direction coinciding with the shooting). The color rendering is excellent and the weight I would say is not a problem, indeed, on the D7100 increases already the size for a more secure grip (advice cmq BG on the machine). I do not feel the need for VR for my photographic needs (mainly people on the move ... so I'm always at 1/200 -1/250 to avoid camera shake). I took it as a replacement for the sigma 18-50 f2.8 HSM EX-DC ... incomparable. sent on July 14, 2017 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 50-135mm f/2.8 DX Pros: Solid and well-built; Clear already af / 2.8; Fluid rings never too light; Not excessive weight and dimensions; MAF not so bad Cons: It is not tropicalized; AF not fast Opinion: Happy owner for about a month of this fabulous optic; How to zoom in on the nikon 17-55 f / 2.8 and nikon 70-210 f / 4-5.6 on the nikon D7100. Compared to the first is less contrasted, as rendered assimilates much to the second; Has a good sharpness already af / 2.8. The AF is not comparable to the Nikon 17-55 but it is cmq at par, if not better, than the nikon 70-210. Zero F / B Focus problems (instead of Sigma 17-50 f2.8 HSM). With subjects that move transversely to the shooting point, I would say that the shots are almost all good (It is advisable to work with a bit of PRE-MAF, where possible, if you are photographing dynamic subjects). With fast-moving or moving subjects, with a concise direction to that of the shooting point, it is a good thing if some of them are focused (AF-C, single point, center, matrix, shutter priority, normal focus tracking, manual) and However, even in 17-55, some of them are in this condition; . It also hooks up in non-optimal light conditions (inside a house in shame).I did not have the need to backlight, but I used it in the afternoon, outside, without hindrance, it did not have Flare problems (probably a fortune, seen what they say) .rnrnAcquisted for 250 euros from Germany has arrived Under the same conditions; I would say it was the billionth investment made. The lens is worth all that money. If you find it (there are really few around) do not let it go unless you have to photograph Lepri chase by Ghepardi.rnrn sent on June 21, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, cheap, lightweight. Cons: Chromatic aberrations at the widest apertures, autofocus, backlight bad. Opinion: The lens has a really good sharpness even at room temperature, in contrast to the widest apertures (say up to 2.8 excluded) presents chromatic aberrations. The engine Af can not "stop" the fast-moving subjects (eg children playing); although I noticed an improvement (always in AF-C) through the single point instead of dynamic area, 9 or 21 points, with 11 AF points; actually also his brother AF-S 50mm F1.8 G has some problems autofocus.rnPessima yield backlit. sent on October 23, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
