|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Enrico C www.juzaphoto.com/p/EnricoC ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 300mm f/2.8 G ED VR Pros: Bright, crisp fearfully, weight still well manageable freehand, excellent yield with vati Tc Cons: the only cons that I found is that, at least in Italy, for bird life is short and needs to be almost always combined with a Tc. Opinion: A truly fabulous goal, smooth has nothing to envy anyone, even at f2.8 is always a blade. For birdlife 300mm unfortunately they are few in Italy (99% of cases) and holds up very well even if all 3 Tc, remains a sin to buy a lens to bring it to life multiplied. On D3 I even played around with 2x and 1.4x III Kenko together, were it not that the af breaks down the couple remains acceptable closing a stop. For those traveling abroad it is so phenomenal, for a purely Italian in use maybe I'd look instead to a 500/600 f4 also stabilized at prices that are not much higher in used. I've also used for sports and portrait, in those fields there it for anyone, simply is the top. sent on March 08, 2016 |
![]() | Manfrotto 055 X PROB Pros: solid in an exaggerated way, the manfrotto for him to 7kg but I could easily support its double if not extend the colonna.rninoltre can get a few inches from the ground with the short column, which is convenient for macro and waterfowl, although it seems trivial many tripods just can not. Cons: and even a rock in weight, with its 2.5kg will definitely feel that after a while it goes around and if you have a gimball attacked becomes a macigno.rn Opinion: I use it for some years now, and we caught everything, rain, rocks, mud, sand, sea water and has never made a turn; it still works perfectly, highly recommended for anyone looking for a solid and durable, the downside and that is sacrificed much portability, so if you have portarvelo below in long walks or on the road is not the most suitable stand. sent on September 11, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me