|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Balsa85 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Balsa85  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony NEX 5T Pros: Sensor, portability, the best NEX as key layout, very workable files and very natural colors, touch screen and 180 degree screen Cons: menu a bit complicated, reading display with sun. Opinion: I had in succession the nex 3,5n,3n,6 and finally the last one just the 5t. Lately I've switched from the sony a7 to the nex5t almost for fun. I wanted a machine that I could use whenever I wanted without fear. I must say, however, that using it every day you appreciate its qualities and the goodness of its files. If you find his viewfinder cheap, you have an improved nex 6 with the keys in the right place. With the sigma triad 19.30, and 60 on this sensor they perform admirably. And on a budget, you can carry everything in your bag while maintaining excellent image quality. Up to 1600 iso during the day it is usable, the grain is not so bad and in post production the files recover well. For photographic use it is a good product in my opinion. sent on March 20, 2024 |
 | Sony FE 28mm f/2 Pros: Lightweight, compact, sharp already at full aperture. Cons: None for the price Opinion: Good quality lens, light and well balanced in overall performance. It pairs perfectly with the a7, an ideal mix for travel and street. Sharpness over the whole frame at least my copy. Vignette a bit but it can be corrected with a click from lightroom. For those looking for quality at an affordable cost there is nothing better. sent on October 24, 2021 |
 | Sony A7 Pros: FF, COMPATTA , USED COST , FILE QUALITY Cons: AF SLOW , RESA ISO Opinion: I have this machine now for a year I can only be happy , it is very compact and the rendering of the files it produces is very good. It goes well with manual optics, the battery life is not the best, but just bring some spare battery and that's it. The cost in the used is ridiculous , it is a must now to enter the format ff. The only flaw the high iso yield above 3200 iso begins to be heard a little noise , overall it is an honest machine I can only recommend. sent on December 06, 2019 |
 | Sony NEX 3N Pros: Small, pocketable, good resistance high ISO, economical visas used price. Cons: The only thing the display that in full sun is not the maximum Opinion: L I have taken as a second travel body to be flanked by the 6d, thanks to its small size and the draught allows to adapt many non-proprietary optics, has a good resistance to high ISO up to 1600 ISO. The advice to those who want to spend little and have a good quality. With the Commlite adapter it works very well I fit the Canon STM lenses and both the AF and the diaphragms work properly. sent on September 15, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Sharpness, color, weight, price Cons: slow but acceptable af. Opinion: I state that the use of Canon. 70d with great satisfaction, at full aperture is soft used only in cases of emergency, it closed 2.8 changes the face becomes a knife, sharpness going to f 11 is exceptional at least in my copy does not make me regret the canon 50 1.4 I had in which I 've changed. The blur is a bit 'nervous ta but closing it becomes better. On APSC makes it very good is about the same as 40 STM but is much more recent. The only flaw is the slow pace of 'af else for the price is a good buy for those who want a 35 with character. You can use a little 'to everything is a good compromise for those who want to use to do some' of all the quality certainly is not lacking. sent on January 31, 2017 |
| Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 Pros: Sharpness, color, weight, price Cons: slow but acceptable af. Opinion: I state that the use of Canon. 70d with great satisfaction, at full aperture is soft used only in cases of emergency, it closed 2.8 changes the face becomes a knife, sharpness going to f 11 is exceptional at least in my copy does not make me regret the canon 50 1.4 I had in which I 've changed. The blur is a bit 'nervous ta but closing it becomes better. On APSC makes it very good is about the same as 40 STM but is much more recent. The only flaw is the slow pace of 'af else for the price is a good buy for those who want a 35 with character. You can use a little 'to everything is a good compromise for those who want to use to do some' of all the quality certainly is not lacking. sent on January 31, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Small size, light, crisp fast af Cons: The slightly noisy af Opinion: The I took a few days but I was immediately impressed by the sharpness and colors. L f is fast and maf manual is accurate and fast. I had before this goal a sigma 30 1.4 24 I thought that with the reduced imgombri but lost in quality, however has been a nice surprise to find otherwise. A beautiful optical really recommend it to everyone. sent on November 05, 2015 |
 | Sony NEX 3 Pros: Light, held at high ISO, dynamic range Cons: lack viewfinder, the screen with the direct sun is not visible. Opinion: I mirroless this now from 6 months was my second body, he has now replaced the reflex almost full. It 'very light and small pocket with optics, the sensor is fantastic the 14mpx are fair and return riccha image of color and detail. In raw files can be recovered much of the shadows even more by two stops, the colors are very beautiful has a very wide dynamic range, the autofocus is slow decent but rarely miss a shot, thanks to the focus using manual focus peaking is a pleasure This is an advantage for those using optical vintage. The estate at high iso is good you can get up to 1600 ISO with a fine and pleasant recoverable in post quietly. The battery lasts for about 200 shots if every time you turn it off even more. Now it located at bargain prices I have taken 140 euro with the kit the advice for people who like to travel light and stay without spending a fortune. sent on May 24, 2015 |
 | Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm f/3.5 Pros: excellent sharpness already wide open, neutral colors, minimum distance-focus very close, it's almost like having a macro with extension tubes becomes unbalanced ratio 1: 1, light and small. Cons: flaw a bit against the light, but for now there are not any other defects. Opinion: I have this wonderful lens from a few days, but already gives me great images. And 'crystal clear already atutta opening to say the f8 on, until now the lens is more' clear that I felt among the vintage-like younger brother 50 2.8 jena. Like the latter, due to reduced distance focus gives almost macro shots with some extension tube are achieved good results. Its qualities are its small size, its very high optical quality, neutral colors a bit cold but real. Among the 135 m 42 I've tried is the sharpest one is bright enough gives soft blur. my copy has treatment mc then worth a little less against the light, the maf is tough but with a bit of maintenance fluid returns. Can not recommend it. sent on December 09, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: for perspective kit is really better than the old IS II is much more 'sharp in the center lose a little on the sides, but I would say it is more' discreet. The AF is fast and quiet, good for videos. Tends to have warm colors, otherwise it's a decent lens at that price. Cons: no one, apart from the loss of sharpness towards the 50mm anything. Opinion: A few weeks ago I bought this lens just for fun since I was old Isii it was not that great, after other similar zoom eg sigma 18-50, I can say that the new stm is really much improved approaches to slow almost to the same category higher . rnIo recommend it to those who are at the beginning and wants to learn to shoot a lens or want to fight to bring it with you. sent on October 31, 2014 |
 | Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 Pros: Blurred pleasant, sharpness, exceptional close up if I reverse a macro is scary. The yield good returns, I would say that the actual colors of the shot. Cons: At a price of 30 euro I would say nothing Opinion: Now I have this lens for about a year, I can say that it was the best purchase I have made. sharp already wide open to the best of f8, which means great for travel weighs just all metal, neutral color rendering some call it cold, but returns the actual colors of the shot. I am using it for portraits, close up and macro and where really good. Downsides might be the maf manual, but for others it could be a pro, I recommend it to everyone when we do not have the deadlifts from the body. I use it on Canon 600d adapters cost a little more than ten euro d. sent on October 22, 2014 |
 | Sigma AF 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Macro Pros: Good build quality from f.9 is perfect to f2.8 is good, even at night Cons: focus ring is difficult to operate, the rest is a great lens to replace the kit Opinion: I took this view for two months and I must say it is a good quality lens, I replaced the 18-55 kits, the difference is more accurate af, at f2.8 allows fuzzy good night behaves well, neutral color, it offers a nice yield from f.9 already, I recommend it as a first lens in place of the kit is located at good prices. sent on January 18, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
