|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giuspiti www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giuspiti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Quality / price, sharpness, blurred Cons: no Opinion: I bought this lens used (200 €) and without knowing the dangers of front-back focus. Result: optical crystal-clear already at full aperture (the use of 5D and 40D), excellent bokeh (for my taste much better than the 1.8 I had fifty), discrete building (not an L, but it is not a plasticone) and perfect focus. Do not miss a photo even with the 5D (which is not just a flash, on paper at least). I've never tried the 50/1.2 so I can not make a comparison, but between the fixed "not L" is eccezionale.rnObiettivo from which I will separate mai.rnIl hood (the absence of which seems to be a "counter" for all) the 'I bought it (new and Chinese) € 2.50 shipped. What you ask for? sent on November 05, 2012 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Sharpness (including TA), ratio Q / P, Bright, nuts accurate, Bayonet metal Cons: Autofocus a bit 'slow and sometimes inaccurate Opinion: I bought this lens for my 40D to have a greater focal length range from wide angle to the 24-70 L will not let me get on APS-C. The price paid (used at 200 €, including UV filters and polarizer) I was expecting a level much lower than the Canon, despite the positive references read on the web. Instead, after a month of heavy use, I can say that and be extremely impressed by this light. Sharper the "lustful" Canon, nice colors, good resistance to flares in backlight, bokeh more than good (for my taste), focal length that I find perfect for my use (from landscape to portrait). At full aperture has been working very well from 17 to 50mm, though the sharpness becomes impressive closing a bit '(but if I buy a 2.8 is because I want to shoot at that focal length). The construction level is not at all comparable to the Canon (neither the 24-70 nor the 17-55) is plasticky, but less than I expected. The collars are hard to the right point and I find it very previse. The lens hood is supplied, it gives an indication of lack of attention to detail (but Canon "forget" just to provide it unless it is optical with red circle), its duty, however, it plays very well. The only flaw is found, if I may say so, is the autofocus. Canon used all'USM found it slow, noisy and inaccurate. Not that it will do his duty under normal conditions (in fact, does not miss a shot), but, for example, shooting at short intervals moving scenes, is able to focus when focus almost random [once taken his hand is a problem that is solved with a little 'attention, but it seems fair to report]. At any rate the quality / price ratio is very high, it is a view that, unless you have extremely more substantial budget, MUST appear in the scope of any amateur photographer as standard zoom. sent on July 18, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
