Reviews written by Paolo Gamelli

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Paolo Gamelli
www.juzaphoto.com/p/PaoloGamelli

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Paolo Gamelli

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Zeiss Batis 40mm f/2 CF

Pros: Lightness, close range, AF Lightning

Cons: I can't find it, maybe I expected it sharper

Opinion: It's definitely a great lens, but not as upsetting as I thought. The sharpness is appreciated from the whole aperture, it does not have a significant increase by closing the diaphragm. It maintains a good contrast on the backlight. It does not suffer from flare flares when the light source is just outside the frame, which is what the 55 suffers a lot. Compared with the 35 1.4 Fe I find that they have a similar character, the 40 maintains a greater center/edge sharpness and a good correction aberrations. Compared also with the 24 105 F4 at 40mm, I would say that they are similar apart from the output in backlight, where the zoom decreases the contrast. Of the Batis is appreciated above all the weight and the homogeneity of the center edge yield. Obvious vignetting at F2, but it was never a problem. A decent 3d pop

sent on November 15, 2018

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

Pros: the same people who all know each other

Cons: transition from fire to fire off unpleasant

Opinion: for now I think it is absolutely the best 35 tried, I did not find faults, so now need to resolve the question of personal taste. Nikon has no comparisons. Canon is a great lens for photo techniques (who does photo techniques with 35?), But for the story I find it too dry. the delicate transition from fire to fire out is bad, thing instead of the 35L is very nice. The test for an objective reportage not you do it at the edges or at 100%. The three-dimensionality is good if the light and fire are favorable, it is always good or outstanding with the 35L instead. So the owners of Canon recommend a used 35L which costs about the same.

sent on July 05, 2014