|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Joshua www.juzaphoto.com/p/Joshua ![]() |
![]() | Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Bright and versatile. Cons: think and very expensive Opinion: Excellent lens for birdlife. It allows incredible shots. With the stabilizer can also take pictures indoors in theaters, museums, exhibitions, sporting events, etc ... The system focusing HSM is very quick and effective. Shame about the weight that is really so if coupled to a body such as 1d or 3DX becomes a rock, difficult to transport. In short, very good lens, if you have strong arms, back good ewd a good portfolio (costs about 2000 euro) sent on May 21, 2015 |
![]() | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Great bell'ottica! Very defined and fantastic colors! Cons: Maybe a little noisy as af ... the rest is worth all that it costs! Opinion: I immediately felt comfortable! I thought it was very similar to the old 100 macro canon, but I changed my mind using it a little! Thanks to the SI allows you to take with a very short time and with extreme quality by eliminating the micromosso.rnMolto beautiful, I advise everyone to do macro pressures and / or normal portraits where it can be possible! sent on January 26, 2015 |
![]() | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: It comes very close to the quality of the Canon 50mm F1.2 L. Bright and sharp ... Cons: heavy Opinion: Very Beautiful. Purchased on a whim to test his 'reputation'. Actually very good. It has a huge front Lenton and compared to the Canon 50mm F1.2 L would say it is very, very close. Obviously, the Canon is slightly sharper but for what it costs I do not think that justifies the expense superior performance, since minor. AF system fast enough and it's nice to have it in hand, if not for the weight of the lens. However, more than CANON 50mm f1.4 suffering of his years. I did not believe .. try it! sent on May 31, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me