|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Enzo-Spotter www.juzaphoto.com/p/Enzo-Spotter ![]() |
![]() | Canon EOS R6 Mark II Pros: Image quality Cons: For now, nothing Opinion: Canon EOS R6 Mark II: The big leap. After much thought I did, I finally bought Canon EOS R6 Mark II. And I must say that it did not disappoint my expectations! What impressed me the most? The 40fps continuous shooting speed is very impressive, and the continuous autofocus is accurate and reliable even with fast-moving subjects. The image quality of the new 24-megapixel sensor delivers exceptional resolution and dynamic range, even in low-light conditions. I haven't tested the video performance yet (but I don't make videos) and I reserve the right to do so but only out of curiosity. The ergonomics are worth an NI, in the sense that it is comfortable to hold and use even for long periods of time, but the layout of the controls even for those who come from the Canon reflex system like me, is a bit complicated to assimilate. Compatibility with EF lenses thanks to the adapter makes it possible to use the entire range of EF lenses with the R6 Mark II. This is a great advantage for those who already own Canon optics, as it allows you to save money and continue to use your favorite optics. And I must say that both the 24 - 105 and the 100 - 400 (especially the latter), offer considerable performance, bordering on exceptional. A note on the price. It depends on where you buy it. I bought it from a well-known online store from where I bought the 100 - 400. Price considerably lower than the official and branded stores. Clearly it is an imported product but I had no difficulty in registering it on the Canon website, a sign that it is not smuggled. sent on March 30, 2024 |
![]() | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Being Canon Cons: For now, none Opinion: I wanted to replace the Tamron 100 - 400 Di VC USD. In short, the difference in quality is perceptible in all conditions. I take aeronautical photos and often push to extreme focal lengths, I have been able to see that at 400mm it has no comparison with the Tamron which already from 300mm suffers from excessive softness of the images. Super stabilization even handheld. Of course, the weight does not play in favor of the Canon and the price, of course, is not at all comparable (the Tamron costs 1200€ less). On the other hand, that extra stop in favor of the Canon plays a fundamental factor in favor of the Canon optics. I use it on both an APSC and a full-frame. On the APSC I noticed a greater decay of quality at the upper extreme focal length, but I think it depends on the size of the sensor. sent on March 01, 2024 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me