|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lealtre100 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lealtre100  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica Summicron-SL 50mm f/2 ASPH Pros: Image quality. Image quality. Image quality (I wrote it three times so you understand). Mechanical robustness, all metal and all quality. Fast autofocus. Cons: The price, the price, the price: 2,000 euros. Opinion: You can easily attach it to a big mega px: it will give you back all the value of the sensor. It is made for 45/61 mpx. Strong in portraits and strong in everything. Do not use with protective filters, you would ruin something; Always leave the lens hood, made of perfect metal that does not detach from the car if you do not want to detach it. Heavy lens. If you keep it well, it will have its fair price even in 20 years. It's an investment. sent on January 28, 2026 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 Pros: A beautiful object, made with care, light as you can imagine for focal aperture and equivalence to a 150 mm. Beautiful lens and image quality. Cons: The autofocus suffers from the 15-year-old design. It has poor speed, forget the continuous autofocus; Non-tropicalized lens. Opinion: This lens is super priced and there are those who sell it for 1000 euros! A real absurdity. The autofocus depresses the speed of the stacked sensor of my Om 3, and all this alters the modernity of the camera; It's a real shame. Added to this is the lack of tropicalization which does not go well with the extraordinary tropicalization of the machine. Too bad that the micro 4\\3 lens park is renewed so little and does not perfect its best optics! The image quality is excellent and the construction of the object is of great quality. The portability is exceptional. sent on January 25, 2026 |
 | OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4 PRO Pros: Image quality, lightness, tropicalized construction. The convenience of carrying it with you is a pleasure. Cons: The price. Opinion: Truly a lens that does not disappoint. Responsive and lightweight at the same time. With my OM 3 it goes very well and gives very good image results. It is made for sunny days, but on the other hand the analogue with 2.8 aperture is not that much brighter (it is the whole mft system that is not made for the night): this one is newer and less heavy, and above all it has a better autofocus. sent on November 28, 2025 |
 | OM System M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 II Pros: Lightness, image quality in the mft field, construction, miniaturization, tropicalization. Cons: Nothing, maybe the price. Opinion: As mentioned, the image quality is really good; Having it is a tactile and visual pleasure, like having a piece of jewelry. It surpasses the quality of the 12-40 pro at the same values. Fast autofocus that matches with my OM 3. It is the tropicalized version of the previous analogue. What can I say? It is a good expense for those who have the micro 4/3..... sent on November 28, 2025 |
 | OM System OM-3 Pros: It is robust, full of mechanical and computer finesse. Autofocus grade 10 (without honors). Top overall speed. Sensor with beautiful colors. Tropicalization at the top. Cons: The menu is obscure. Opinion: It is an mft so, whatever is fashionable to say that the image quality is worth the full frame (it is not made for the night ....) do not be fooled, the full frame is the full frame, nor can you console yourself with the 50 mpx for immobile subjects. It has an image quality that cannot be surpassed currently in the mft field. Impeccable construction at a negligible weight, this must be the real reason for the purchase. The stacked sensor then expresses all its speed and quality. Those who preceded me in the comments are right about one thing: once you buy this machine, the other (full frame) stays at home. sent on October 09, 2025 |
 | Sigma FP Pros: A car from six years ago, brilliant at the time of its debut. A tropicalized and very solid camera body. With grip and viewfinder (expensive and high quality), it becomes a normal camera. High-quality, raw files without pre-staining for even better detail and color. High-quality raw raw development. Cons: Lack of stabilization, autofocus completely outdated. It is a machine that is difficult to resell. Lack of mechanical trigger. Opinion: I kept it for a couple of years and then I was able to resell it. I also had FPL, but FP is better and is less plagued by micro blur. Excellent photos. A meditative machine that I regret a little. The video sector is good but now outdated: the machine is six years old and everyone can hear it, but it has some non-ordinary qualities. I hope they make an updated model with modern autofocus, stabilization and a better file reading speed. sent on February 09, 2025 |
 | Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Pros: It was a very nice lens and it still is: the colors are beautiful, the blur is very nice. The materials in which it is made are solid and valuable: the Art are a guarantee from that point of view. The lens is also very bright. Cons: The weight is now abnormal, it does not allow agility to the photographer. Auto focus belongs to another era. It's unsuitable for video. Opinion: It's a finite goal. Beautiful but technologically outdated (it was designed before 2017, and seven years nowadays is a long time). The auto focus is quite slow and not very precise, these are things that are no longer tolerable in the current landscape. The price remains high. However, some companies are getting rid of it at bargain prices. Soon the replacement will arrive at higher prices and with three hundred grams less weight. That doesn't mean that the photos don't have a fairytale beauty.... sent on June 06, 2024 |
 | Panasonic S5 II Pros: Stabilization rated 10, file rated 8, autofocus rated 9, ergonomics rated 9, video capability rated 10, viewfinder rated 7. Cons: Battery rating 6, AI not decisive, RAW development in the camera rating 6, beware of high ISO noise danger (for those who, like me, are used to the performance of the Sigma fp). Opinion: I bought it and I have no intention of changing it, also because I have a sigma fp that has opposite qualities and defects, so the two cameras compensate for my needs. To those who were to enter the mirrorless world, I would not recommend it and I would invite you to consider Sony/Canon. To those who are already in the L Mount consortium, perhaps I would say to wait for a more performing model (as far as photos are concerned, because on the video front it is a higher-level camera. P.S. The April 2024 firmware has improved auto focus significantly. sent on January 04, 2024 |
 | Panasonic Lumix S Pro 24-70mm f/2.8 Pros: Excellent construction, solidity and elasticity. Wonderful detail. Cons: Nothing and the weight is normal... Opinion: A classic zoom lens, extremely refined and without smudges on the sides. Certified by Leica (and you can see why) it definitely can't disappoint! the price is going down, also because you buy more Sigma..... No aberrations found. With the Lumix s5 ii it matches beautifully, it has a very responsive autofocus. sent on December 06, 2023 |
 | Sigma FP L Pros: The file. The internal development of the DNG. Resistance to high ISO, even considering the 61 mpx. Cons: Stabilization no, mechanical shutter no. Opinion: A camera dedicated to image quality. He loves great lenses and therefore fixed glasses and level zooms are recommended. At iso 6 it's pretty much unbeatable, unless you buy a high-quality large format machine. In full frame there is nothing like that (put Leica lenses on it and it will be like the Leica). It is one of the few machines to use a neutral DNG without pre-coloring. It is very sturdy and with the accessory grip it holds well in the hand. It has great resistance to high iso. However, you have to be very, very careful with the microblur. sent on May 05, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
