Reviews written by Arki

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Arki
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Arki

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Arki

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Pros: Lightness, resistance to rain (with 12-50), stabilizer body, customizing buttons, dynamic range, resolution electronic viewfinder, jpeg quality, do not need a heavy tripod

Cons: LCD with improved resolution, frets a bit 'small

Opinion: I have a car with the 12-50 series, and after 6 months of use are soddisfatto.rnGrazie to its wide dynamic range, but that 'you can appreciate just at home on the screen or in print, in weight compared to the yield and quality good resistance to rain, I would recommend it to anyone who wants to enjoy trekking and have good photos without carrying around 2kg attrezzatura.rnPioggia: and 'a great release to give a damn great, I did quietly turned on by pictures in the drizzle, to be turned off in pouch around his neck have been there more 'than an hour in a great downpour in the mountains, no problem. Obviously 'must a filter and a lens stabilizer allows tropicalizzato.rnLo with a steady hand to use really low times and then take pictures in really light conditions scarsa.rnMirino: I am very well, has a good level of detail and also in colors, to move from screen viewfinder use the small key 'cause the proximity sensor' and 'a bit' too sensitive, and 'sufficiently usable even with occhiali.rnSchermo: does its job, it can tilt helps a lot, eventhat it would be better if he could lean down another 30 degrees. The touch screen sometimes just use it to select the point of focus and the size of the current focus. Definition and color rendition of the screen instead are definitely improvable: the digital zoom function for fine focus and practically 'usable only with mirino.rnI keys: you' are actually little ones, especially for those with large hands, sometimes I happen to press REC instead of Fn2 or vice versa, ditto for PLAY and Fn1, however, 'is offset by the fact of being able to customize the function of each button in a body so' compact: you can 'have configured keys simultaneously to access the ISO , White Balance, zoom, play, flash, burst / self-timer, type of setup fuoco.rnLa battery lasts long enough to make us a trek of two days, but 2 batteries rise every thought :) rnL'ostacolo more 'big. with the 12-50, and 'non-urban night photography (landscapes or sky): difficult to focus if you do not have a bright star or a lighthouse in the distance as riferimento.rnL' only thing that I miss veramente compared to where I used the Canon CHDK, and 'a timer to trigger every X in automatico.rnIn last, though not negligible for those who go to the mountains, as you can stand' also use things like a cullmann Nanomax 250 (1.1 kg ) without stability problems', and thus save more weight in zaino.rnNOTA WELL: before use, and 'imperative to read this manual completely, and then configure it according to your needs and only lastly you can' enjoy this marvel, otherwise can 'be really tricky to use.

sent on December 16, 2013

Canon PowerShot SX200 IS

Pros: Controls manualirnZoom 12xrnmessa focus from 0cm in supermacrornPossibilita 'to use it with CHDKrnRegolazione intensity' of flashrnAccessibilita 'functions (for a compact) rnBuona autonomy

Cons: Poor performance at high ISOrnErgonomia migliorabilernMancanza viewfinder

Opinion: To be a compact 2009-2010, efficiently play its functions to ISO low, compare to current models (2013) or bridge / mirrorless would be foolish. With the quality 'of a compact, covers a bit' all kinds of pictures from a macro, landscapes and even in telephoto with zoom, except those dynamics, and AF 'sa bit slow. I found it convenient to adjust the intensity 'of the flash, the less convenient it opens each time. Thanks to the CHDK firmware and 'can expand its functions considerably shooting in RAW, using timing and even create basic script. Its only sore pictures in low light at ISO 400 and 'just usable, 800 noise and' very showy, 1600 sucks. The mode 'AUTO, in my opinion makes photos poor, while in mode' scenes can be good, but it 's better to learn to use it in manual for best results.

sent on March 14, 2013