Reviews written by Luca Sacco

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Luca Sacco
www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaSacco

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Luca Sacco

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 L IS USM

Pros: Autofocus, IS, focal length, weight and size

Cons: Excursion to f5.6

Opinion: I bought my 70-300 L in August and I was amazed by its versatility. Certainly it is not a 2.8 but for outdoor or sporting events or whatever I have more than enough indeed! I am not a professional and my little experience in the backpack always close ... has caused a flight to down the scale.rnCosì, I thought I'd go to 70-200 LII, but I've done a number of considerations and this morning I decided to ............ buy back another 70-300! rnNe I felt greatly missed, especially when I have been to some sporting events with a loan Tamron.rnTrovo that has been designed just for my needs and if I do not it is essential to always bring him with me. The weight, compactness, speed of focus, the hike to 300, they know perfectly compensate for the lack of a fixed f4, otherwise it would have been perfect! RnNon feel the need of the collar because the extreme maneuverability allows me to take it anywhere and then to be even more comfortable, without cavalletto.rnRipeto, half a kilo less than the 50mm and 70-200 are really a lot and in my considerations, have had (again) a lot importanza.rnVale all his prezzo.rnP.s. A 300 is not the best, but remember that the others stop to 200! ;))

sent on November 20, 2013

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM

Pros: Three-dimensional, brightness, color, strength.

Cons: Not to use it every day.

Opinion: I was hesitant because of the price but I'm glad I bought it a few days ago, it is amazing! I get better at using it than with a hypothetical 85 1.2 for its greater field of view, and after taking some close-ups and especially narrow environments ... well ... I continued for hours in disbelief brightness. I come from the 50 1.4 but this is another way of doing photography. I read any review of comparison between the two and in many cases it is said that the difference is minimal, but you kidding???? Oh 50 1.4 is great but ... the colors and especially the almost poetic Bokeh 1 .2 leave you speechless. Does not seem to suffer from the absence of the IS, and its weight is less than 85, then good buy and I will be glued to my 5D MK3 for quite a while '!

sent on November 18, 2013