|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea Amato www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreaAmato  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Pros: Economic, focal interesting for landscape photos, good sharpness Cons: Poor resistance to flare, distortion at wide-angle focal Opinion: Good lens for landscapes of APSC with good sharpness. Autofocus slow but preciso.rnDistorsione accentuated the focal wide-angle, difficult to correct in post, I prefer to use it from 12 up. Does not have a great resistance to flare, but is sharp enough for landscape photos is light and often was my only companion together with a polarizer and the eos 500. We have fun together often sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Good sharpness from f 2 of the entire frame. Grand opening Cons: My model has problems in focus that try to solve by using it in the manual. Opinion: Good lens considering the cost, always returns a good blur in photos portraiture, with the flaw shape shutter clearly visible and not well rounded in certain situations. Sharp always stopping down. The focus is rather unreliable openings higher and it is better to rely on manual focus when possible. sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Sharpness, price, af fast, resistance to flare Cons: distortion at wide-angle focal Opinion: Objective I use to landscape photography. and in sports. The autofocus is always fast and accurate, the sharpness is very good even at the edges of a stop closing the diaphragm, while the center is still great. Also good resistance to flare and backlight, I also like the star closing around the diaphragm, the point light sources at night sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Velcoità Af, stabilizer, engraving and image quality, the quality of focus Cons: Overweight Opinion: Objective versatile, great for any kind: from sports, to the landscape, the portrait. The focus is pleasant accentuated with longer focal tele but always returns a good incision area made fuoco.rn The only limit is the weight due to the excellent stabilizer, so often renounce take him below preferring quality objectives worst but more transportable sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Lightweight camera body, made at high iso, workability of the file, precisely the central point of focus Cons: Construction weak, I broke lcd only with vibration, low gust, shutter 1/40000 Opinion: Machine exciting. Despite my favorite genre is the landscape I was never made to feel the need to change the logo for a better dynamic range. rnTenuta at high ISO up to its reputation. Transportable, lightweight, I prefer to use it without greep, really a featherweight and passes inosservata.rnMi also love the color rendering, I used this car to sports photos, rally in particular and I must say that the af does not disappoint, because they are accustomed to using only the center focus point sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon 1Ds Mark II Pros: Machine body indestructible, never a problem even in the worst weather conditions. File very natural and workable. The flesh tones are fabulous, as well as the color rendering in the landscapes. The clogged to 1/8000 in certain situations is a boon, the autofocus is very precise and accurate in most uses. The iso except the extended mode are always very beautiful grit artistic Cons: High ISO mode unusable, my model suffers particularly hot pixels in long exposures Opinion: Camera fascinating. Massive body and sturdy but I struggle to bring it below. The buttons and also mistreated arrangement of the menu is very comoda.rnFino to 1600 ISO is a pleasure to use, if a little 'noise you notice is in my opinion very nice and not ever speak to reduce it. rnUtilizzata in sports, the autofocus is accurate but the display unusable does not make you understand if you're at the right times and in the portrait or landscape meno.rnNel I find it fantastic, both for color management for highlights and shadows. sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Canon 500D Pros: Light, resolution still adequate to modern needs, Iso good up to 400, up to 800 usable without major problems, above rushes foresight in exposing and noise reduction in post. Lcd still capable of carrying out his duty, AF at the center point very accurately at least in my model. Cons: A few points of focus, imprecision lateral points species in difficult lighting conditions, tendency to underexpose, high iso used with extreme caution, long exposures reflected much noise even at low ISO. Opinion: Machine with which I started back in 2010 and that still use with satisfaction. And 'my car traveling I use with optical cheaper, but I have always been allowed to bring home good ricordi.rnCon you've done all the various courses that I followed to date, from the basic course to course of flash in sports photography, the course of studio lighting. I must say that although not a professional model, has always given me a lot of satisfaction knowing the limits of the medium and made me grow as a photographer. Now I have other models that use outputs for a bit 'more serious, but this is the car that stole my heart. sent on February 24, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
