|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sibbeone www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sibbeone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony SLT-A37 Pros: Piccolarneconomicarnstabilizzatarnaf continuornraffica 7fpsrnmonta the zeiss af Cons: elettronica.rnnon level has 60p.rnNon has the strap Canon.rnnon there 'written on the Nikon body. Opinion: The best entrylevel 2011, two steps above the Nikon Canon.rnPiccola as a cut above the 100D but more ergonomic three-point cross-type AF (compared with 0 of competition); stabilizer on the sensor, 7fps burst in (compared to 3); AF continuous shooting, preview scatto.rnSe had been Canon would have cost twice and inserted between the semi-pro. sent on May 16, 2014 |
 | Sony 24mm f/2 SSM Carl Zeiss Distagon T* Pros: Three-dimensional reading of the shadows, Sharpness TA, colors, bokeh, Solid, AF, price (compared to other zeiss). Cons: is not tropicalizzato.rn Opinion: You can not understand what is the three-dimensionality of a Zeiss until you try it, I was pleasantly surprised by the reading of the shadows and the overall sharpness of the images in relation to the 50/1.4 and 90 Macro I have, two objectives risolventi.rnLa much greater sharpness is achieved at F4 but compared to F2, is known only in the corners as the center of the improvement is so sensitive that it can hardly be seen. Also nice bokeh, although it is a 24mm you can do, unpretentious, portraits and macro settled, the minimum barrel distortion, improves closing a couple of stops, no sticker on APSC if not significantly only in TA.rnHo favorite the drive for compactness, the price and the stop advantage over the 16-35 and 24-70. sent on October 14, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: Quality / price ratio; rncontrasto; rnNitido Tarn Cons: lentorndistanza inaccurate autofocus and focus about 9cm 1:1 actual (without hood) too short to live insects Opinion: The best quality / price ratio, to be honest I thought it was less difficult to do macro, the distance of focus for the 1:1 ratio is only 9 cm, too few to photo for live insects, at least for me . rnLo use to do Macro with great satisfaction, I can take advantage of the excellent sharpness and contrast for landscapes and the bokeh at f2.8 for portraits (not female). The only discordant note is the autofocus, inaccurate and embarrassing slowness; rnNon has stabilized but for me I problema.rnUltima Sony is not a thing, I note that Nikon and Sony in a 1:1 ratio at room temperature is shown by the machine f2.8 (nominal aperture) instead of f4 (actual diaphragm) sent on May 31, 2013 |
 | Sony 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Brightness, bokeh, good sharpness from F2.8, autofocus quickly and precisely even in low light, small, lightweight, solid construction. Cons: of APSC is tight for indoor very soft at room temperature Opinion: Optical aberration very strong at F1.4, F2.8 disappears; BOKEH a bit 'nervous at F1.4, F2.0 to excellent; rnABERRAZIONE CROMATICA purplish at F1.4, F2.0 imperceptible, F2 disappears .8 rnNITIDEZZA: soft at F1.4 to F1.8 but already closing becomes good, F2.8 to be a blade of reference between f4 and f8. rnad be honest is not a lens usable in TA except to save ISO or decrease the shutter is closed one / two stops is nitidissima.rnIl Sigma 50 1.4 is sharper at TA, closed are indistinguishable. If you want to save money there '50 1.8rn sent on March 05, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
