|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Miki Guglielmi www.juzaphoto.com/p/Miki_Guglielmi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: construction, brightness, solidity, weight is not a problem, Cons: at the moment nothing, soft edges (first impression but I have to double check) Opinion: Nikon D780: Arrived this morning, immediately put on the dock-usb, calibrated with the double method "LENSCAL tablet" and DOT-TUNE method. It had front focus respectively +15 +14, +12, however difference cost on the different focusing distances. I reserve the right to update the first impressions after period of use. The only doubt, tried with maximum opening 1.4, as expected it was a bit soft on the edges. Closed at f4, I thought I would find an improvement, but it was equally soft. I reserve the right to test it outdoors in daylight. sent on February 16, 2023 |
 | Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, versatility, construction, dock calibrable Cons: weight (but it's normal), sport, hood (then I explain) Opinion: NIKON D780: Hi, I state that I am an amateur photographer, so this review will be based almost on very subjective and unprofessional elements. So it is aimed at those like me who do not use it for work. I bought this used lens, about 3 years ago at the RCE photo, perfect lens comparable to new, very reliable sellers. Immediately calibrated with the dock, it presented on average on all focal lengths an imbalance of about +-2. Ritarato these days had only some small variations, probably due to the difference in temperature. The lens returns sharp shots even at large openings, used mainly in summer to photograph daytime softball games (A1 and A2) and baseball, it was almost never opened below the f 4, with shots from outside the field of about 10-30 meters, with almost static subjects. I state that it is a type of sport that does not prefer continuous movement, however, sometimes it was used in bursts during the runs on the bases, the shots in focus were good at 30-40%, I can not tell you if it is a good percentage, but I was not so interested in running on the bases, as the arrival on the bags, where he almost never missed the fire. The shots returned are presented with warmer and contrasting tones than the other Tamron lenses I had in the past, and this was a good surprise, I was afraid to come across the washed out colors again. If I really have to find a small defect, I point out the hood, many times I remove the hood, to mount screw or magnetic filters, and as I do with other optics, not to lose it I reassemble it on the contrary, well - if remounted on the contrary it covers the entire zoom ring, preventing use. This is nonsense, but at the moment it is the only thing I point out. The anti-vibration system does its duty, as the construction of the lens itself, provides a feeling of solidity. Weight has its value, but if you take a zoom from f 2.8, you can't expect a featherweight or a plastic toy. Here, I recommend the purchase of the lens to those like me who do not use it professionally but purely amateur, the only reason for the clarification, is that I do not have the professional skills to be able to recommend it to a professional. sent on January 24, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
