|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Giuseppe_Giuseppe www.juzaphoto.com/p/Giuseppe_Giuseppe  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D100 Pros: Robustness, image quality, sharpness Cons: Slow menu navigation, 6 megapixels Opinion: It was my first digital SLR. Bought used, I immediately appreciated the image quality, colors and sharpness. I had a very good feeling with the camera body and the position of its controls. The machine is sturdy and this affects the weight a bit. Compared to newer cameras the limits emerge, but it is a camera of substance. What I have always not tolerated in the D100 are its 6 megapixels because, producing beautiful photos, I have always regretted not having the original larger file for larger format prints. sent on September 12, 2024 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Pros: Size, focal range, image quality, video definition and sound quality, number of adjustments, semi-automatic and manual shooting options Cons: When switching on, you must be careful not to obstruct the ascent of the flash Opinion: Camera that I recommend for its lightness, the quality of the photos, the focal range, the numerous settings, for the quality of the videos and sound. It allows you to shoot with aperture and shutter speed priority and completely manual. When traveling, size and weight are an indisputable advantage; Of course, the size of the sensor is limited. I have never tried it at high Iso. I have never used the built-in GPS although I have read in other reviews that it draws a lot of power. Highly recommended. sent on September 11, 2024 |
 | Panasonic Lumix LX5 Pros: Build quality, sharpness, lightness, completeness of functions. Cons: Sensor size limit? Opinion: Exceptional machine, although no longer recent, but which I recommend. On the road it is perfect and the presence, in terms of weight and size, is almost imperceptible. The adjustments are numerous. He also shoots in Raw. It is also possible to shoot at aperture or shutter speed priority or completely in manual. The quality of the photos is higher than expected, despite the physical limitation of the sensor size. The focal range is remarkable and the wide-angle limit is equivalent to 24 mm; 90mm for telephoto. Highly recommended. sent on September 11, 2024 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Robustness, build quality, photo quality, dual SD card slots Cons: Weight, low-light autofocus Opinion: Quality, robust camera. This is reflected in the weight. The images are well detailed. The sensor is 16 megapixels and everyone is individually aware if they can suffice. I use it for landscapes and portraits, and in good light, it produces detailed photos. Autofocus isn't always accurate in low light. The tightness of the Iso is good up to 400 (maybe even at 800 Iso but it doesn't drive me crazy), then the detail, in my opinion is unwatchable. I read in the other reviews that the D7100 and D7200 are on another level. For the use I mainly make of it (static subjects), the D7000 is fine. For photos that are a little more dynamic and in darker places (even simply photos in church for communions, baptisms, weddings, etc.,), if I can't use the flash or if I'm far from the subject, I find myself in more difficulty than other people who have more recent and high-performance cameras (in particular cameras that hold better at high Iso and that allow you to shoot at 1600 Iso handheld, without flash, and still get sharp photos). Even the night landscape (camera on tripod, Iso 100 and long shutter speeds), leaves me a bit perplexed, but I could also be unable to make the correct adjustments. For today's price of used cars I cannot fail to recommend it even if, I repeat, I read enthusiastic reviews of the D7100 and D7200 from those who come from the D7000. sent on September 11, 2024 |
 | Tamron 20-40mm f/2.7-3.5 SP Pros: Build quality, definition, brightness, for FF and Aps-C Cons: Focal range, weight Opinion: Sharp lens with a wide minimum focal length. It produces sharp shots, even if a bit cold compared to other lenses I own (but I think it is enough to intervene a priori on the camera adjustments). The only limit I have always perceived is not so much the weight, but its focal range; I would have liked it to have had a greater focal range both as a wide-angle and towards more extreme focal lengths. This is a known fact, but when you are out and about with your camera and you have only this lens with you, it happens that you would like to have more focal range. It is still a lens that, although dated, I recommend. It is good for FF and Aps-C sensors. sent on September 11, 2024 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Lightness, focal range, build quality, brightness, definition in the center, versatility Cons: Edge Definition Opinion: Highly recommended lens for versatility and lightness. On the road, it allows you to take most of the photos. The sharpness is remarkable; I used it for landscapes and portraits and the result was almost always exceptional. Bright, although I tried to always use it at F8 for extra sharpness. I highly recommend it because it can give a lot of satisfaction. In my case it was not necessary to buy the USB Dock for adjustment; if needed, it can be found on average at € 40.00 new and € 30.00 used. sent on September 11, 2024 |
 | Tamron SP 10-24mm F/3.5-4.5 Di II LD Pros: Build quality, focal range Cons: Sharpness Opinion: A lens that immediately makes you perceive its build quality because, even if it is made of plastic, it is robust. The focal range is widely versatile. It is not among the darkest lenses, but not even among the brightest, but this focal length did not create problems for me because I have often used it for landscapes for which I have used the tripod. The real flaw compared to all the other lenses I have owned is the sharpness; I tried all the possible adjustments in the camera, but the result was always a poor sharpness compared to all the other lenses (with which I reached a level of definition beyond expectations). As also reported by another user, I also have the impression that it focuses better on near subjects than on distant ones. I'm pleased to see that the photos uploaded to Juzaphoto by other users are well defined; I have almost never succeeded, I don't know if it is due to incorrect adjustments or inability to use PP programs. I have read reviews on the internet about this lens and it seems that the weak point is precisely the sharpness. However, it is a lens that gives satisfaction, if the result is good and / or if you are able to make the correct adjustments on the camera and with photo editing programs. I do not advise against it. sent on September 11, 2024 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
