|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
LeonardoBru www.juzaphoto.com/p/LeonardoBru ![]() |
![]() | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Sharpness, blurry, build quality, price Cons: Slightly noisy with OS active. Opinion: One of the best macros I've tried. The sharpness is very good as well as the blurred is well rendered. What makes it, in my opinion, sensational, is the value for money. For less than 400 euros you can buy a lens that has nothing to envy to the Nikon or Canon, indeed. The only flaw is the noise of the focus when the OS is active, but it's no big deal, since you certainly don't have to start a wedding. In conclusion, I highly recommend it. Is spending twice as much on the Nikon macro worth it? In my opinion, absolutely not! sent on August 30, 2020 |
![]() | Nikon AF-P 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G DX VR Pros: Quality, sharpness, AF speed. Cons: Nothing relevant. Opinion: Reminding us that it is still the lens from kit by definition, it is ABSOLUTELY MORE THAN VALIDO. Good sharpness and minimal chromatic aberrations, considering the type of lens. With direct light, there's not much lens flare, despite the advice to spend 10 euros and buy yourself a lampshade. The focus is simply phenomenal, quick and silent, especially compared to that of the old 18-55 AF-S. sent on March 17, 2020 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Price, size, good build quality. Cons: Obvious chromatic aberrations and little TA sharpness. Opinion: Overall it is a more than VALID lens for the price at which it is located. However, at full opening (1.8) the images are very "soft" (little sharp, in short) going to compromise especially the close-ups, in which the lack of sharpness is immediately noticeable. In any case, if you put the diaphragm f/2.0 - f/2.2, the photos are valid and the sharpness is satisfactory. For the rest, at full-time the chromatic aberrations are evident, despite it's not a big deal as the post resolves easily. In conclusion, it is certainly not qualitatively the best lens there is, but for the price that HAS LO CONSIGLIO. sent on March 17, 2020 |
![]() | Nikon D5600 Pros: Photo quality, ergonomics, battery life. Cons: Lack of High Speed Sync for flash. Opinion: Overall, great camera. For the price it is today (under 450 euros) I think it is the best you can find. With its original battery it lasts a lot (at a party I made more than a thousand RAW shots, some even with built-in flash, and the battery was at just under half). Unfortunately with the external flash does not support the HSS, but this is a feature of the entire 3000 and 5000 series. In conclusion, if you want to take an entry level room, THE FULL TIP. sent on January 16, 2020 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me