|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Konig87 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Konig87 ![]() |
![]() | Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Pros: Versatility, weight, all-rounder Cons: too little light, and therefore also the cost Opinion: It can be fine as a handyman in situations with MOOOOLTA brightness. Already zooming a little comes soon to f6 so GOODBYE indoor photographs in conditions of medium brightness, unless you have a Z9 that responds very well to very high ISO. It can replace the supplied 24-70 f4, for a trip, given its versatility, minimum footprint and very low weight, but forget about doing serious things in dim environments such as indoor situations or sunsets. The mouth is 67mm so smaller than the 24-70 f4 (which has a 72mm) and therefore with the same zoom, iso times and aperture the photo comes out a darker hair, but you can compensate in post production. In essence? 750 euros are worth them, but no more. I do not return it because of the practicality and the minimum encumbrance, I am a hobbyist and I might as well carry less ballast with you. At the moment so I will carry around this, and the unsurpassed Z 14-24 f2.8 (which is worth gold for how much it weighs) for landscaping, while for indoor events I leave it at home. sent on May 05, 2022 |
![]() | Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S Pros: Sharpness, weight, handling, tropicalization Cons: cost a bit 'excessive Opinion: Recently purchased, I have to try it with the starry but based on what I see, it does its job very well. Obviously being a particular target, its use is quite limited (it is not a 24-70 all-rounder, here) so it is required in particular situations. From the first moment I was amazed by its sharpness, it simplifies post-production so much. It can always be used with a totally open diaphragm without giving any problem or disturbance. Highly recommended, if you really need it! sent on December 02, 2021 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me