|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Darioca www.juzaphoto.com/p/Darioca  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S Pros: compactness, lightness, sharpness, silence, construction, AF Cons: Nobody Opinion: Let's start with aesthetics. Many criticize the cheap aspect, but I think that the "essential" line is a bit widespread and the trend of the moment, as far as construction is concerned nothing to say. Many do not like that S lenses should be opened before using them, but I do not find it a flaw, rather a feature. The yield is spectacular at full open, much of it from edge to edge. The focus is fast and quiet, in the videos you don't hear NIENT. The lightness and compactness make it a well-designed lens for a mirrorless where transportability must be the maximum. If I have to find a fault, I don't like the starry with the sun in the backlight, but it's cheap stuff. Double dive, the first for zooming the second is programmable. In short, to be a kit lens I would say that it is definitely a very high level, on the other hand all the native S targets are on average higher than the F. There are those who say that it is on par with 24-70 f2.8 F, but I have never tried the latter. sent on October 29, 2019 |
 | Nikon Z6 Pros: lightness, robustness, stabilization, Z mount, AF, ergonomics, video, EVF sight, total compatibility with F Mount, ISO,focus peaking, focus stacking, timelapse Cons: XQD cards (reliable but expensive), video logs not in the room, not being able to load it while using Opinion: Bought just over a month ago. I come from D300, the technological difference is so much in favor of the Z6, of course, but it still does not make me regret the typical characteristics of a reflex. I read a lot before choosing and I have to say that in practical use has little to envy to direct rivals (type sony), still not at the level, but for some features and uses is even superior. The battery has never given me particular problems of durability, the mirrorless we know that because of the use of EVF and Monitor consume more, but coming from reflex and accustomed to always look in the crosshairs for my uses I have no particular problems, let's say that on the 500-600 shots I do. The use with its 24-70 Z f4 which is crisp and practical, the 2.8 in my opinion is to be left to those who have special needs of blurry and brightness. It has a spectacular burst, a great ISO high yield and a viewfinder that doesn't make you regret the optic one. The focus for the use I do i do has never given me problems, for now as moving subjects I took to children playing and never missed a photo, always precise on face or eye. Among other things, the AF has the ability to regulate its responsiveness and transition speed. The board is expensive, but once you get the reliability and speed make you forget how much you paid, you don't miss the second slot. A firmware will be available soon to make it compatible with the CFExpress standard. Too bad to download photos or use an external player or you have to use proprietary software, but this is a small thing. The spectacular videos, with different possibilities of fps and even the 120 fps with normal speed and then slowed down during editing. Too bad that to have video log files you need an external monitor, we hope for a software update. The F mount optics are fully compatible with the adapter, except those without autofocus engine where you have to sew by hand, but I prefer the Z optics otherwise if I have to bring me heavy and bulky optics you lose the practicality of a system mirrorless (except for special cases). The system in total with its Z optics thanks to the Z mount and stabilizer on the sensor (which works very well) allows the development of light, compact and qualitative optics that are frontandout from edge to board. We hope for a rapid development of new optics. It has a thousand other features including focus peaking, focus stacking and timelapse that I still have to try though. The menu for those who have always used Nikon is the classic and well manageable without trauma and anyway there is the possibility to customize it a minimum. In short, the transition from reflex to mirrorless was not at all traumatic, thanks to the Z6 for now I found only advantages. I reserve to integrate and/or corrects the review, for now the Z6 can do things that I do not know yet to do :-) sent on September 27, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
