|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bio981 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bio981  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma DP1 Merrill Pros: Image quality, compact size, colors, black / white, materials, brightness Cons: Slow operation, battery not up, from compact ergonomics, software sigma very slow Opinion: The Foveon sensor is a standing ovation, its performance at low ISO simply questioning years and years spent in the pursuit of perfection of the Bayer sensor. What is a Bayer sensor that boasts decades of development when there is the Foveon that already from its earliest versions sweeps away every competitor? Because the sensor Bayer snaps safely beyond the 400ISO? Perhaps the answer is more just this, but those who REALLY need to go beyond the 400ISO in their photographic style? Because if we stay in this range ISO supremacy of the Foveon is embarrassing. The colors, the nuances, the details are at such levels that the Nikon D800E lion turns into a cuddly kitten when compared with the "pocket" DP Merrill. So this DP1 Merrill is destined to reinvent the photography and wipe out what on the market today? No, I would not say ... The quality of the sensor causes disbelief to monitor and absolute devotion in print but then you have to makeaccounts on the defects or the "compromise." DP Merrill cameras (all three) suffer from the same problems: they are slow in AF, are slow to write the files, the rear monitor is just decent, the batteries in the summer makes a hundred shots and less in winter, from 800ISO up is worse than the results of the phones, the software Sigma for processing RAW (the only one who can read) has elementary functions and is a slow disarming. And then there is the worst flaw: once saw a file processed by Foveon unlikely you will watch the files of your sensors "traditional" with the same eyes as before ... forewarned ... I conclude by mentioning also the white / black: These machines seems made for BW! The files are even more amazing than in color and, using the blue channel, you can have excellent results even at ISO6400! sent on April 10, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm X100T Pros: Image quality, processing jpg ooc, hybrid viewfinder, solid body, seven customizable keys, compact lens and bright, exceptional aesthetics, shutter from 1 / 32,000, syncro flash 1/4000, whisper quiet, expandable with the converter. Cons: Battery life, improved autofocus, addictive. Opinion: Who buys a series of Fujifilm X100 has very little to discover. He knows everything. Or almost. It 'a machine suitable for those who know what they want from their photographic experience and this X100T is, nowadays, probably the very essence of the concept of photography that is closest to each of us. The 35mm focal length is a historical, together with the 50mm focal length is easier to relate to our eye. And who says otherwise is lying to himself. Then put a 35mm in a compact and rugged, foul nice bright comandalo through a Galilean optical viewfinder which becomes an electronic rangefinder (according to Fujifilm) or directly to an electronic viewfinder and you have the X100. Missing the heart though. We must get it right because the car has to be special, and that's the X-Trans. A breath of fresh air in the face of decades in which large companies have made us believe that only the pattern Bayer could be "digital photography". The X-Trans is special, is unconventional, is perfect for a camera like the X100T. Has its colors, its nuances, its yield that can not be compared to Bayer with the usual test dpreview style. Be tested, do not add more. sent on February 10, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
