|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Franz71 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Franz71  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Lightweight, optical quality Cons: not stabilized Opinion: I have this lens for a few years and I mount it on the D7500, I wanted to use it for portraits because it is equivalent to a focal length of 75 mm that with open apertures gives me an excellent bokeh, but the reality is that the focus is difficult and even with fast times I can not have decent results in the portrait. So x me is bad. Then on tripod and self-timer I raise my hands, it's fine because the optical scheme is tested, nothing to say, but x the use I wanted to do I do not see it well. It would be the case x Nikon to start working seriously, otherwise they all leave on sony. Then they have to decide whether to carry on the SLR system or not, for the aps-c that are an excellent compromise (I like my D7500) they do not produce optics, what to say. These market strategies no longer satisfy me. Returning to 50 mm, lacks stabilization, peace sent on September 01, 2021 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Versatile Cons: Brightness Opinion: I also had it in mating at the D7000, it was still very good, now D7500-16-80 which of course is better. I always felt good, great to take on the road, but then to do some more consistent work and for a better definition I just went to 16-80 on 20.89 Mpx. The only thing unfriendly is the opening 3.5-5.6 too low, but I made so many shots printed then 30x45 on cotton paper and I'd say it holds well sent on December 24, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7500 Pros: Excellent up-grade compared to the D7000, precise autofocus I would say, it seems to me right the choice of the 20.9 Mpx and in fact the high ISO yield goes very well, just as the recovery of even 3-4 stop, incredible, I like and I'm happy with the choice. The 7500 is also excellent for the multiplication of long lenses for photographic hunting typical of the reduced sensor. I Don't care about the battery-grip. Cons: I don't understand why. As on all I guess, when I start a shooting on Trepod and select the shot with remote control and up mirror, this feature is not always kept, and is to be confirmed every time something changes. I'D prefer a stiffer system. For the rest certainly the absent double slot could make the nose twist but never happened to me a problem on the SD, never in years and years of shots with D80 and D7000. Opinion: 5 months from the purchase I'm happy with this camera and I recommend to all those who want to stay on APS-C. Does not disappoint on anything I would say. The file is nice and the first changes I do on capture NX-D, I'm fine to open the NEF with proprietary software, then I go to PS. Use with Nikon 16-80, Zeiss 50 mm f1.4, Nikon 70-300 AF-P and short with Tamron 60 mm F2. I Await a D760 FF hoping for the retro illuminated sensor because someone says to see big differences (between 810 and 850 ad es). Greetings to All sent on April 09, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: Right focal length excursion, lens treatment, supplied lens hood Cons: Distortion over 16 mm (I believe higher than the same focal as the 16-85 had previously) Opinion: Since about 3 weeks I have taken D7500 + 16-80 and I am trying to understand the rendering of the system. I ask the community what do you think of the focus at 16 mm in Live view, I'm doing so for photos on tripod to which I request precision and is not convincing me much. Try to photograph the stones of a trullo or a dry wall in a situation of diffused light, maybe backlight, and then give me feedback. I am not so satisfied. I do not by visual satisfaction just the optimization phase in live view of the fire, I do not spout the right sharpness sent on January 03, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
