|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianlucadario87 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gianlucadario87  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: f/2.8, abb.nitido, stabilizer Cons: plasticky, noisy autofocus, stabilizer (vc) noisy, heavy, light overexposure Opinion: I have the version for nikon. is a lens of choice with respect to the second most popular tokina 16-50 or nikon 17-55 etc. etc.rne feels and sees all. sometimes useful to have a f2.8 aperture but it is the only positive thing that I find in this lens. I advise everyone to keep the classic all-rounder 18-105 that the rest is very much better. (Between focal 18:50 is f3.5 - f4.5 you lose 1-2 stops) RNE a tamron and is therefore by definition a dice plastic cn solid feel zero. focus is a bit 'noisy .. but hooks well enough if there is abba light. in critical or near-critical (that is a little dim light) go autofocus with manual focus that goes for his cabbages. in my version of the vc (stabilizer) is quite noisy. works perfectly (I do not know what I'd do without!) but it is very very annoying as noise. a kind of whistle / continuous buzzing since hooks (half press shutter button) to a few seconds after the shot (when it drops). wasnziona cmq very, very well, as well as that of the 18,105 and well .. It is highly recommended .. without vc would not be that easy especially for someone who has no hands too firm .. and also because the objective is particularly heavy (compared with the 18 105 for example) .. else .. slight tendency to overexpose. but if you go raw then it's an instant fix .... :) sent on October 08, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
