|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Francesco Sestili www.juzaphoto.com/p/FrancescoSestili ![]() |
![]() | Zeiss Loxia 50mm f/2 Pros: Impeccable construction, very high detail of the files; absolute excellence. 'And my goal, in the non-action photo, except for precise directions to use something else. Cons: A certain cumbersomeness having to apply it to the more than disengage from the machine body. Opinion: I think it's the best when it's 50mm. it proposes itself as a focal point that best expresses photographically what we have in mind; it is also proposed in Nikon. In no way is there a lack of autofocus; automatic magnification is of incredible simplicity and precision. I could replace it only by switching to the digital mediumform that just mediumformed then is not but that undoubtedly something more gives than the 24 x 36 mm. sent on December 19, 2020 |
![]() | Leitz Super Angulon 21mm f/4 Pros: Solid construction, high quality, adaptability to all reflex, although those with Sony only you have the ability to zoom in to two levels image for perfect focus; to say, however, that this focus is generally used for the landscape and architecture with focus to infinity. These are fields in which for clarity and brilliance of color has very few rivals despite being a lens not exactly recent. Cons: I could say the vignetting but it is an inevitable feature of the wide-angle and also pushed the brand in this area. Almost a plus; I like. Who was uncompromising in this regard it would have perhaps the only choice of the Zeiss 24mm. Sony A. Opinion: MMT is available to about 500 euro; too many? I would not say to the foregoing; inter alia this focal length is currently incorporated almost always in the range of zoom lenses and I are, with one exception in my kit, for fixed. Although time passes Superangulon is far from being overcome and I will keep for a long time its value over time. rnPRECISAZIONE: the view of the above refers to the Leitz Superangulon 21 Type R. sent on September 19, 2015 |
![]() | Nikon D3 Pros: extreme strength, essenzialità.rn Cons: The vision on the display I find it a bit 'disappointing, when compared to that of my Sony A99, but it is a much older project. At the end of post-production fears that at first sight it raises the tutto.rnp.s .: vanish after a year of use I correct the bad impression initially received by the display; absolutely unproblematic vision. Opinion: For the pros and cons I agree substantially with what was said by those who preceded me. Instead, what context it is that with its sensor can not to crop. I do absolutely never on the files while I do not foreclosures to make the reduction on the sensor; the DX format of the D3, provided that the subjects are not particularly furthest permits, as far as the megapixels is only reduced to 5.1. http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=960922&l=itrn sent on August 01, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me