Reviews written by Gever

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Join JuzaPhoto!

A A ? HELP SEARCH

Gever
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gever

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Gever

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Fujifilm X-T5

Pros: Lightness Resolution Portability

Cons: Battery life heats up a lot

Opinion: I state that I work mainly with Pentax which remains my first and great love (I have been using it since 1972.....obviously changing model). I bought this camera for photos during concerts or when the shutter of the mirror can be annoying. The choice fell on fuji for the goodness of the sensors and for the program behind the processing of RAW files, identical to the Pentax one (silkypix). I also remember that the first (analog) bayonet fuji had the Pentax K mount. The photos are of excellent quality with beautiful color rendering. Noise at high ISO almost irrelevant, easy to correct with the software (obviously for a good performance I think it is essential to use the program at the base of fuji raw files that is silkypix, I have been using it for over 12 years and now I am at version 12 PRO). I have read a lot of criticism but I am more than used to criticism as I am in the Pentax world. There is always someone who doesn't like to drink something, and there is always someone who criticizes on principle. Overall it is an excellent room suitable for the purpose for which it was purchased by me (photos in classical music street theater). at a distance of about 6000 shots I integrate my opinion. I don't understand the criticism of file size: the amount in terms of pixels has its own in the amount of bits!! The resolution in terms of pixels necessarily involves larger files Without prejudice to what was said at the time, I found a "poor" battery life compared to what I can do with Pentax; shots bordering on hyperrealism, you can see that they are digital, they lack a film-like softness effect that other sensors and brands have: during the development of the raw I often intervened to "soften" the image. Of course, the rendering appears more in line with the current way of photographing more tending to surrealism than to nature, but I don't like hyperrealistic or almost surreal images. cmq remains a good room.

sent on 08 Luglio 2025