|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
SerMan60 www.juzaphoto.com/p/SerMan60  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 Pros: Sharpness, contrast, colors and what has already been said and known about this lens Cons: For me, no one Opinion: Having already had several Zeiss in classic version, I always thought I would prefer them aesthetically to the Milvus. Then I had an unmissable opportunity of the Milvus 135/2, and I could not let it get away (although having the same lens in Classic version). Well from my simple home trials, although the two lenses have the exact same optical scheme, I think I can say that the Milvus has a, albeit very small, best yield. In the sharpness, contrast and saturation of colors. I think if I remember correctly, the same is said for the 100 Makro, between the Classic and Milvus versions. It is very difficult to improve lenses that are born close to perfection, but with the Milvus the engineers of Zeiss have succeeded. On an aesthetic level, I am starting to be attracted more and more by the new more modern line of the Milvus, but I still do not feel that I can say that I prefer it to the beautiful vintage line of the Classic. Other improvements include waterproofing, less delicate coating, manual focus ring (according to me) and finally also writings and caps (but on the caps it was not difficult to improve). As for the cons, it would be easy to say the price, but for the quality and sophistication of the lens and materials I would say that it is absolutely justified. Finally, manual fire, which thinking about it is by no means a limit, considering that we are talking about a lens not suitable for everyone and that is not born for the street, but for a refined and studioic use. Rating 10 cum laude sent on September 10, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
