|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nutritionvalley www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nutritionvalley  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II ASPH Pros: Small, lightweight, good image quality. Cost Cons: AF on E-M5 MKII Opinion: It's the only lens I've resold out of desperation. I may have been unlucky, so maybe not everyone is like that. Before taking it I had read on the net that it gave bands at high ISO, but I have never seen defects of this type. I used it on an Olympus E-M5 MKII and it was a tragedy the focus. I state that this camera has in itself a really ridiculous focus for the price it had. Since the lens has a 1.7 aperture I bought it exclusively to take family photos at home. The focus with the low lights was not the best and in any case the photos were never sharp, had some problems my specimen I think. When I sold it, a videomaker with a Panasonic took it and he also noticed that the focus was not precise, but he used it manually, so the problem was quite relative. Then I repeat, maybe it was my defective specimen. If you are in my condition I do not recommend it. If, on the other hand, you do street and use it mainly during the day and with diaphragms a little more closed than 1.7 it is an excellent lens, it has few defects, especially for what it costs. If you have to make the use that I made of it I recommend the panaleica 15mm 1.7 (if you are not short even the Olympus 25 1.8 is excellent). It is true that it costs much more, but at least the photos come as they should come and the keding is also correct. So if you want to use it as a handyman it is excellent. If you use it mainly because you need the 1.7 then better other goals. sent on November 13, 2021 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Sensor, value for money Cons: 'A slightly' camera "castrated". With bisognafarci hand menu. Opinion: I changed the 7D with this camera after much thought lungo.rnLa review will not be on the characteristics of the 6D which you can read anywhere, but a little 'a comparison of what I more and meno.rnL'ho used only a few times in sports: football and race in full equitazione.rnGli iso are not a problem, while they were on the 7D and parecchio.rnSforna beautiful files and work easily, unlike the 7D which basically was the reason that prompted me to change it and never was more choice azzeccata.rnL'AF is enough. You can not make good use of reeds in sporting events. Should I try with the birds to give a final judgment, but everything else is more than enough. Obviously what the 7D is another world, but also with the 6D I can very well to shoot moving subjects without many problemi.rnSull'esposimetro do not pronounce me because for the little that I used the results were good. These things are evaluated in tempo.rnSono been very satisfied of 'purchase, especially for the relationship prezzo.rnWI-FI useful qualities. rnTra a bit 'of time the affiancherò a 80D so I will make my perfetto.rnA cameras kit unless they serve you a blazingly fast burst and AF high-performance I recommend it, it is a purpose camera that produces wonderful file. sent on November 13, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
