|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bennyibleo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bennyibleo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Construction, brightness, value for money (at least at current prices), sharpness Cons: Af inaccurate Opinion: Bought online at 245 euros (parallel import), as soon as I arrived I immediately made to my sample the test of the 3 batteries, diaphragm to f. 2.8. Result: slight back focus at focal lengths 17 and 21 mm, it is accentuated at 28 and 35 mm, to disappear at 50 mm. The entity varies slightly from shot to snap. I have not tried other diaphragms. Obviously it can also be due to my camera, now dated (eos 300d). The focus is fast and quite silent. The construction is excellent, the lens is solid (and 'an EX series) the zoom ring has the right hardness and there are no yokes. The images are beautiful, detailed, sharp, at all focal lengths, with a prevalence of focal lengths from 30 mm upwards. All in all I decided to keep it, I think the inaccuracies of the f in practical use and with more closed diaphragms should pass almost unnoticed (to detect them at 17 and 21 mm you need to make a specific crop in the area in focus), but remains the advantage of having a well built, very bright and nit lensIDE. sent on January 15, 2018 |
 | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.9 Pros: Featherweight, excellent quality Cons: I do not see it Opinion: I used it with a 108MP yashica, obviously in manual mode, and switching to DSLR canon I had the chance to continue using it with a 17 euro adapter ring with MF confirmation chip. What can I say, I found myself in my hands an excellent portrait lens (on APS-C frames like an 80 mm, keeping however compared to the latter a prospect more similar to that of the human eye). Despite this lens at the time did turn up his nose in comparison to his little brother f.1,7, I must say that shows excellent color rendering and excellent sharpness, in addition to the pleasure of focusing in manual with a beautiful wide and smooth ring. They pull it behind you on the used market. sent on January 14, 2018 |
 | Canon 300D Pros: Cost very content, does what you need without frills, and what he does (the photos) does it well. Cons: Small display (but for the time it was normal). The plastic coating of the handle over time becomes soft and sticky, I had to peel off and cover with a bit of leatherette as it had become really unpleasant to the touch. Opinion: I come from a manual yashica SLR, which by the advent of digital has become an ornament. This camera has allowed me to switch to digital with a modest expense, continuing to use the optics in my possession through a 17 euro adapter ring, obviously in manual (but I did so much earlier). What can I say, the sensor returns sharp images and contrast, does not offer high ISO (but with the film I've never used more than 400 ISO) and despite today we have made believe that 6 megapixel are a joke, making 2 counts there realizes that for an amateur use, 6 megapixels are too many since a common full hd monitor has a resolution slightly greater than 2 megapixels, and if you want to go to the press, with 6 megapixels you can easily print a 20x30 photo without interpolation , and a 30x45 with a light interpolation that is not even noticed on the final print, looking at it closely. Me with the normal 50mmm yashica I made a couple of portraits to my daughter printed one 30x45 and one even 40x60, with a bit of pp, bothbi framed and hung in the study. Then if you want a picture, cut a crop a couple of centimeters and enlarge it 50 times, then the subject changes and here the megapixel would never be enough. In addition, the car is beautiful, it handles well and despite being plastic (it was the first SLR to get under a thousand euros) gives a good feeling of solidity. The manual focus is not 'the best for those who like me it comes from a pentaprism with broken image, but the adapter ring has the chip that makes the focus indicator work in the viewfinder and also the beep, so you can use manual focusing quite easily. I use it as a priority of the diaphragm, imposed by the lens ring, and I leave the time setting to the camera, which I can obviously control by opening the aperture I choose to use, and for what I have to do I stop and move forward. Considering that today is used around 80 euros, I think it is excellent for people like me comes from an SLR analogica, and I already have the fundamentals of photography, has the possibility to continue to shoot, obviously always in manual, without having to throw the optics out to the nettles. The only discordant note is the quality of the plastic used for the handle, which is obviously treated with a substance that makes it soft, but which over time makes it sticky and sticky, so that it becomes very unpleasant to the touch. I solved by removing the plastic handle and covering it with fake stolen leather ... sorry ... borrowed from my mother-in-law who is a seamstress, but from what I've read around this problem also affects other SLRs from the cost much greater.The supplied software is available at most for win xp, but much more than 'connect the machine to the PC, just take out the memory card and through a very common USB card reader and' possible with a few euro transfer images to the pc. In short, I am very happy with the purchase, and even if it were to break because it already has a few years on its shoulders, I would cry con an eye seeing how much it cost from new when it came out (€ 950) and how much I have paid it now I used (€ 85). sent on January 06, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
