|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
André Roveyaz www.juzaphoto.com/p/AndreRoveyaz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 600mm f/4 E FL ED VR Pros: Quality, AF, Weight, Balance Cons: nothing Opinion: Exceptional lens, I think the best supertelephoto I've owned so far (300 VRII, 200-400 and 500 FL) Super image quality, practically no degradation multiplied with tc1.4x, with the 2x you still take home super images, especially with bodies with few mpx like d5/d6. The weight is relatively low but not as low. Thanks to the perfect balance, it can be used freehand. Exceptional also adapted on nikon z8/z9, in some respects it is even better than on reflex. sent on May 06, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-S 500mm f/4 E FL ED VR Pros: Sharpness, weight, balance, construction. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I was lucky enough to buy it used at a great price, it is the best purchase ever made, it has virtually no downside, I can only talk about it well. Paired with the 850 is outstanding, it is able to return a detail unthinkable already to f4. With the 1.4 III there is no image degradation nor a slowing down of the af Af fast and precise, vr excellent, in the mountains does not tire excessively given the excellent balance. sent on January 13, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 200-400mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Flexibility, brightness, construction, used price, relatively compact Cons: Many have marked weight as defect, in fact more than the end weight in itself I consider the balance not optimal, the weight is all moved forward. Opinion: I got hold of it now a year ago, used first on d600 then on d500 and now occasionally on the 850. Very versatile lens, it is not a feather but it is not even exaggeratedly heavy, what tired in freehand use in my opinion are not the 3.3kg but the balance, the weight is all towards the front lens. The autofocus is fairly fast, a middle ground between my 150-600 sigma c and the 500 Fl. On the d500 is reborn, the absence of the AA filter greatly improves its performance. Despite his age, vr works well. It has a great value for money, the first version is used between 1800 and 2200 euros sent on January 13, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Weight, sharpness, quality, colors etc. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have now for 5/6 months, is the perfect lens for me, being all in all light in the mountains is a pleasure to carry it, has an optical quality for me at the top, I'm very satisfied with the purchase, I recommend it to all those who want something light and High quality. I use it on d600 I usually always shoot with tripod and MF, but when I happen to shoot freehand I know that the VR and the AF are really awesome sent on January 08, 2019 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Price, sharpness, 14mm, brightness, weight Cons: Distortion, but negligible for my kind of photo Opinion: I bought the lens in question from about 5/6 months, photographing landscapes only I thought of taking a super wide light to take me in the photographic excursions along with the rest of the equipment, on FF 14mm are really many, and it is not easy to compose Well because there really is a lot of stuff, I don't use it very much to be honest. However it is a very good lens, for Nikon costs just over 300euro, excellent sharpness, well done, I am fully satisfied sent on September 11, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
