|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Outback www.juzaphoto.com/p/Outback  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Leica Q2 Pros: Amazing optical quality, compact, light, stabilized, perfect menus and buttons and AF suitable for not too fast use, good interaction with Photos app. Personally then I find it beautiful (I chose the Reporter version) in the Leica panorama has an exceptional price / performance ratio. Cons: It lacks a second SD, has a bad lens cover, the quality of the Jpeg is not great the monitor is fixed. The new Q3 is superior from many points of view but the fact that the new one is better does not make the old version worse Opinion: It is one of the cameras I use the most and is perfectly suited for my photographic preferences, only for architectural shots the 28mm focal length is sometimes too limited but for those I go to M10r with the 21mm. I find the crop in the room very comfortable with the luminous handsets as with the beloved M and very valid both the viewfinder and the monitor (apart from the fact that it is fixed). It is very quiet and minimally invasive. A handbag, camera, a couple of extra batteries and you can turn the. world! sent on June 01, 2023 |
 | Leica M (Typ 240) Pros: The usual excellent quality materials Leica, modernity and tradition in a single device. Few frills and even fewer options for adjustment or operation. Sharpness, dynamic range and color rendering up to expectations though, at least for the dynamic range, not equal to the best SLR flagship. The arrival of a CMOS sensor has enabled the live-view. Combined with Leica optics and some of Zeiss and Voigtlander returns images of the highest quality and unmistakable imprint Leica. Great exposure that finally allows you to choose different reading systems (multi-zone and center-weighted and spot) and is also more consistent in the values ??of the previous ones. Bright viewfinder and contrasted as in the best M. The Frames viewfinder are more accurate and readable than those of the past. Battery from the considerable autonomy Cons: Those typical of the Leica M system are but for many of us long-time users of a dress comfortable and convenient! The digital viewfinder is manufactured by Olympus quality very modest compared to the latest version but incompatible (VF4) when using liveview for obvious reasons the point of focus is only the center of the frame, which makes it very problematic focus on different points. The position of the SD below the bottom of the battery compartment is secure but very uncomfortable (for another I also Nikon DF with the same defect ..) especially if you mount one of the two optional handles. Focus peaking poor and poorly made. For those who use the Jpeg are not that great. Opinion: Photographer with Leica M for almost 40 years and then the undeniably long curve of adaptation that the system requires to get the best you can give is established and achieved; many friends "hardline traditionalists" will not be in agreement, but I personally think the M 240 M Type the best ever, exceeds almost all the limitations of the system without losing the prerogatives best. Certain other steps forward are desirable and welcome in particular the use, vision and focus assist image with monitor and optional viewfinders. Certainly it is not a camera that shines for versatility of use and is totally alien to the main photographic interests of the average user of this forum but when it comes to reportage, street, photo-journalism and also a landscape less "fashionable" (ie without big-stopper, ND, focus stacking etc.etc.) and in the capable hands and aware is a real killer, do not miss a beat! Many consider it too expensive but no more expensive than the SLR flagship plus allows you to use natively best goalsAlways. sent on December 25, 2014 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Pros: Size and weight, electronic viewfinder, super efficient stabilizer in the camera body, weather sealing, build quality and quality of the files, great (almost too much) customization options, excellent dynamic range, natural colors and saturated, Jpeg fairytale, optical and numeros level high, quiet and fast AF-S lightning Cons: Battery life, AF-C does not live up to the SLR high or medium-high Opinion: My main kit and therefore more use is being made by Leica digital M; practical photographic genres with pleasure "aliens" to M as the photo nature which is why I joined this time in a Canon system and complete quality. Since, almost to bet, I bought an Olympus E-M5 and some lenses SLR cameras have begun to gather dust in the closet. Since switching to the E-M1 I began to rejoice as when I use my beloved Leica M. In the first months of 2015 will hit a lens 300mm F.4, 0 (covering the corner of a 600mm on FF) and in that definitely spend time to M4 / 3 and will yield any residual instrument Canon. Molds for only up to A2 format and this sacrifice quality than the 5D MKIII and optical L is visible, but it is not. In A3 + what most use are substantially equivalent (for as I am capable of producing or post sooooo much). I tried to print using traditional methods from digital files in 70-100 (Lambda print) and in this case between 5MKIII D and E-M1 differences there are (at least I do not see them) so I am quite ready to abandon! sent on May 05, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
