|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Daysleeper www.juzaphoto.com/p/Daysleeper  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR Pros: compactness, cost, VR, Cons: in manual control difficult, filters revolve zooming, little light, blurred difficult to obtain, lack of lens hood and in any case not bayonet. (There is a little stretch rubber hood that screw on the ring and filter are particularly comfortable for goals so) Opinion: As with many for me was the first goal. The money it costs them deserves all, is not evil or useless, but I preferred to change it as soon as possible with an older 18-70. How bright is a bit 'better (70 mean), but we are roughly in the same range. The 18-55 practically do not use it, if not at some time in the evening because of VR. I must say that those extra 15mm make me comfortable and even brighter and larger rings of 18-70. As a first goal, 55, is very suitable, but since the cost is comparable, I'd recommend the 18-70. You lose the VR but there is a little 'more for focal margin to the portrait, you gain a little' luminostà and then blurred. Then it seems to me that the photos are sharper with the 18-70 but I did not test objectives. The 18-55 is a lens that will always leave the desire for something more more zoom, more openness, af faster, etc. etc. BUT, looking at the photos taken with this lens, you might say: first start taking that are excellent photos with the 18-55, then think about how to expand the equipment. Ps: 18-70 does not have the built-in autofocus motor, so it is suitable for entry level SLR. sent on August 05, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
