|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mirko Tinelli www.juzaphoto.com/p/MirkoTinelli ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Price and weight. Cons: At the moment no one. Opinion: I'd preferred the 35mm 1.8 ever of Nikon's home because I thought the 50th as a corner. After a few clicks, however, I find a remarkable color rendition and a great bokeh effect. Blurry is better than little brother 35 and it seems to me, perhaps for optical construction, that the 50 is even sharper. Of course you have to move around to try to capture the scene you are interested in and maybe some of it remains out. Obviously the 50 is certainly not suitable for all shots, but I like the colors that pulls out especially inside. Always use it at 1.8. sent on October 25, 2017 |
![]() | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Sharpness and construction Cons: Close focus? Opinion: Basically I did the 3-pack test without any problems with front back focus, I must say I was afraid to find defects. I have this slow for about 2 months, my body machine is a Nikon d5500. Solid construction with tactile materials. I happened to put my fingers over the manual focus ring instead of the zoom ring. I was slightly forced but nothing happened. So you need to be careful if you do not want to ruin the lens. The sharpness is good, at TA with 50 mm i can do beautiful bokeh, even at 18 mm the results are good. In low light conditions it seems to me, but I still have to try it well, that the AF misses a few strikes. The same thing happened to me when I try to shoot from a few inches, even if it is not a macro lens, some photos come back blurry (for example, water droplets on trees, green on a green background). Here I ask the opinion of the most experienced people, could it be my Nikon or the lens that work hard? Overall, compared to kit 18-55, the jump is onit, beautiful colors that it forces. sent on September 11, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me