RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Bilatti87
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bilatti87



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Bilatti87


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_xt1Fujifilm X-T1

Pros: High ISO, color rendering, sensor, size, viewfinder

Cons: Autofocus not very fast, rubbers and plastics, low iso jpg files not very defined, no concession profiles on third-party software

Opinion: I have owned the car for about ten years. I do not hide that it is perhaps the most beautiful Xtrans series in terms of color rendering. A rendering that honestly no subsequent Xtrans can reproduce. Antecedent yes, as x-e1 or x-pro1. Maybe Xtrans 1 is even better. I always carry it with me. It's suitably small, and with a good lens which in my case is a 35mm, you can take pretty good shots. Honestly, in printing this sensor is the best of all. I can recognize with the naked eye which xt1 is among other photographs taken by other cameras. And this says a lot. A very obvious flaw, in my opinion, is the lack of resolution at low iso. Let me explain. It churns out files all in all of 5mb which are not bad in terms of resolution but, in my opinion, at low iso it could do more. The difference in resolution with the raw file is very noticeable. If, on the other hand, the iso is raised from 1600 onwards, the machine offers excellent files. Maybe a little noisy by today's standards but certainly great for 13x18 or 20x30 printing. For those who want to take advantage of the 16mpx at low iso is forced to use the software that fuji offers because only in that case you will have (more or less) the correct film simulations. You can also use other software but you will always have the problem of not having its film simulations. Too bad Fuji hasn't given me a worthy successor yet. If on this sensor,in 2025 they had put a more accurate algorithm for low iso on resolution (faster processor),availability on film profiles for other software and a fast autofocus.... well.... I would start to evaluate. To date all this has not happened and I believe it will never happen. Needless to say, Af is slow. It's not one of the worst but it's quite slow. Not to mention Continuous AF. Unusable in my opinion. Although I must say, studied well on horizontal movements he did not hurt in a football match. But it remains a machine with which to have absolute calm.

sent on October 23, 2025




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me