RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Joyorsobruno
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Joyorsobruno



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Joyorsobruno


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

jupiter11_135f4Jupiter 11 - 135mm f/4

Pros: Historical goal, which I used on the mythical Zenith E, when I was a teenager, also duplicated with Kenko 2x. What memories!. Solid like a rock, very very rustic, optically valid.-

Cons: Approximate construction, made in URSS.- (copied from DDR optics)

Opinion: Take it and keep it for a while. Never give it away. Every now and then you can use it, but it has the screwdriver. It is true that I fixed it with a ring that makes it compatible with canon FD (without any automatism, obviously) already in the 70s, when the Zenith let me walk and replaced it with a beautiful Nikon F1 (old) that I own today And is an exceptional analog camera that allows me to still use a Zeiss Biotar 58 mm F2 (World War II) and Jupiter 11 135 f4.-

sent on July 25, 2017


sigma_20_f1-4artSigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

Pros: Very good optics, at least on d800 and 810. From optical point of view it's great. Both as lenses and as construction. Price advantageous. Pictures of the starry sky pay off, alone, the expense and sacrifice of carrying it on the bag. I also have a Nikkor 16 35 f 4 but this is a bit more opaque and does not distort. Brightness is great. It does not dominate. This is a very good thing, in my opinion, unappetizing only for the false filter problem. To have!

Cons: Goofy and heavy, can not use filters,

Opinion: It is highly recommended if you are brave and not in the brand blazon. Sigma, however, is no longer the one in the back. It now produces lords targets! The commercial results also speak for themselves. The problem of autofocus did not appear in my specimen. I think it's an internet legend since I have the art series 50 on 20 and 85 1.4 and on d 800 and 810 are perfect as far as focusing. I also own the Dock but I did not have to fix it. The 85's then a lightning strike is very accurate because the engine has been improved

sent on June 18, 2017




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me