|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pastakira www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pastakira  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tokina ATX-M 85mm f/1.8 FE Plus Pros: Full aperture sharpness, bokeh and cost Cons: Autofocus Opinion: Fantastic lens, value for money at the top, only for the autofocus the sony remains superior, for the rest they are absolutely comparable. I do not understand why in Italy and not only this lens has not become popular. Heavy but with a soft and pleasant bokeh. For those who wonder, despite the similarity it is absolutely not the clone of the Viltrox. sent on May 04, 2022 |
 | Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: Cost, aperture, stabilization, sharpness, autofocus Cons: Only for apsc Opinion: Excellent lens, stabilization in such a light and bright small lens is a masterpiece. Excellent clarity and rendering both photographic and video. Autofocus good, not a lightning bolt like Sony has accustomed us lately but it is still effective. Great lens for apsc format (here's the big con) too bad the full frame version is much lower. A must have for Sony rooms if it wasn't for a competitor who eats it for breakfast - sigma 56. However, it has a considerable strength compared to its competitor which is stabilization that still makes it very attractive both in price and performance. sent on March 24, 2021 |
 | Sony E PZ 18-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Focal excursion, autofocus, motorized zoom Cons: Sharpness Opinion: I had a relationship of hatreds and I love with this goal: bought and found 3 times (used). On the one hand when I didn't have it I missed it from the point of view of comfort as the motorized zoom and the excellent focal excursion make it an excellent handyman that can be used in multiple situations, however using mainly now the fixes for videos, I used it above all for photographic releases and here arises the problem: the very low clarity in the photos. Optics especially useful for those who use the camera mainly for video use and very little for photos, otherwise there is better. I try the 18 135 waiting to be able to afford the 17 70 tamron, I think the final zoom for sony apsc sent on March 24, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Pros: Cost, lightness, brightness Cons: Autofocus, materials, soft at 1.8 Opinion: Entry level lens for those approaching the fixers, well the mark Ii as they took away the horrible plastic attack. A f1.8 is soft as sharpness and at the edges but is normal. Suitable for those who start. There are fixed at 50 much better, on Canon on all the 50 1.4 now greatly deprecied. The most positive note is certainly the cost: with a centello (even much less used) you take home a bright lens sent on March 24, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
