Reviews written by Ennio S.

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Ennio S.
www.juzaphoto.com/p/EnnioS.

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Ennio S.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G

Pros: Light and luminous

Cons: For price and quality photos - none.

Opinion: I used this lens on several occasions and I also compared it with the Nikon F 1.4 and with the famous Sigma F 1.4 (tested with Nikon D850) .rn- In comparison with his successor there is no comparison much better F1.8 indeed I think the F1.4 a hole in the water as they have worsened the optics - cost absurd for an optic ill fattarn- Compared instead with the Sigma 1.4 does not suffer from the classic problems of B / F focus, the weight of the sigma after half a day is it makes you feel. The sigma at TA reacts better, the MAF is slightly faster but this is obvious since we are talking about a 2017 vision - but that does not justify the price.rnrnNikon 50 mm F 1.8 is around 150/160 € new Europe. rnrnAllego link with other photos taken with the Nikon 50 mm https://www.ennioscarcelli.com/dance. rnrnMi available for further clarification

sent on December 12, 2017

Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD

Pros: Sharp, fast MAF

Cons: Nobody at the moment

Opinion: I bought the new Tamron 10-24 driven by the curiosity and the need to have an ultra-wide. The barrel is well constructed and the weight is not excessive, at first impact seems very solid. The MAF is fast and silent compared to its predecessor and compared to Tokina 11-20 with which many compare it, but we still talk about a recent 2017 release. The only blow is the brightness as it is not a fixed F2.8 but it depends Always from end use. I still have to test it 100% to check flare resistance etc. Positive note that does not suffer from F / B focus. The zoom ring is a tough clown, it will surely leap over time, even though I personally prefer it.

sent on June 14, 2017