|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Danardi www.juzaphoto.com/p/Danardi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Mitakon Speedmaster 50mm f/0.95 Pro Pros: diameter compact and robustornMateriali construction pregiatirnGhiera maf with long wheelbase for a meggiorernBuon precision detail, from 1.4 onwards very well usable) rnPDC really infinitesimal in good TArnUniformità, with 70% of the frame Cons: Made rather soft on lucernSfuocato points all in all not so "nice" (probably for the exaggerated amount of lenses used and very low frontal diameter) rnBordi not very usabilirnAssenza "click" on the diaphragm: sometimes the ring is moved inavvertitamenternNessuna electronic board that talks with the camera body (so no exif, and not optimal stabilization) Opinion: It is not that you draw them easier to find on the market glasses. Of course very special, and ambizioso.rnrnE 'already in its second version, from a diameter of 58mm filters the initial version, the second version of the 67mm version .. or "pro" version .. or M67 fact, even they know what to call I .rnrnNon know if it's always the same Mitakon producing generic lenses for film SLRs. Today it is a company that has jumped on very specific market niches. Many are waiting to see what happens when it comes out this elusive 135mm f1.4, while I took a much more affordable 50mm f0.95.rnrnNo no, no pictures of the package, the leather casket, etc. etc .. ok , cute, but so it ends up in the attic like all other scatole.rnrnVi story just why the network are not images of mitakon 50mm F0.95 mk2 with the lens hood: it is unwatchable. A "thing" in velvety plastic rounded gray mouse that does not sitnot at all with the rest of the optics Lovely black metal spigoloso.rnrnLo know that its function is not to be nice, but if you can not see can not vedere..rnrnhttp: //www.danardi.net/public / blog / photos / technical / mitakon-50mm-f0-95-the-crazy-first-part-of the East / 2017/01 / sent on January 29, 2017 |
 | Sony A7r II Pros: Sensor stratospheric from all points of view even if there is to really get the hang of in efficacernTiraggio PPrnStabilizzatore minimum which allows the use of any optical via meccanicornPossibilità adapter to mount optics Nikon and Canon maintaining all automatic (with appropriate adapters) rnBestione of focus easy manual Cons: Menu incomprehensible and disordinatornLimitazioni software depending on the optics mounted or ways of lavorornRitardo reality / EVF still limitanternScarsissime AF performance with little lucernLogica really absurd AF Opinion: Technology runs, where are we? RnrnLa old school wants SLRs are the top for quick use. Architecture necessary, given that the image focal plane there is a film, trall'altro, should not be lit up to the time of the click. The focus then should be done by moving the focal plane away, or better yet deviandolo.rnrnLa digital technology 'tells us that it is not necessary to hold the sensing element in the dark. And the latest innovations can bring the phase detection sensors, those normally used on the SLR, within the sensor immagine.rnrnLa speed of the digital video codec also allows to have a replica of the image captured by a sensor on a monitor (ocular or rear display) with extremely contenuti.rnrnSulla paper delay times so we have cameras without mirror (mirrorless) so the technique theory tells us: rnrnPro: rnrn no position error between the AF sensor, and the sensor immaginern opportunityà to combine in the AF algorithms both the information of the phase sensors that of contrastorn display in "real time" as well as the image would be captured at the click (for both framing that for exposure) rn possibility of having camera bodies with draft (distance between sensor and bayonet coupling optics) extremely ridottornrnContro: rnrn needs enormous amounts of energy to keep constantly active imaging sensor and monitor during the increasingly inquadraturern image sensor lit with risks surriscaldamentorn sensor phase detection necessarily very smaller than those installed on the SLR, so much less sensibilirn amount of data to be processed in real-time great having everything taken by the image sensor instead dedicatirnrn sensors rnrnSulla practice, however, where we are? My curiosity to amateur geek has also resisted too, in the end I gave in and joined to my Nikon D750 a Sony A7R2.rnrnPer me SLR most voted reportage (the D750 is able to focus in incredible condition and very quickly, as well as having a high-performance sensor), and mirrorless fullframe more evolved (the A7R2 is the only one backilluminated a sensor, a myriad of phase sensors distributed over most of the frame) .rnrnMa manages the A7R2 to keep readiness pace and speed of D750? rnrn [spoiler] NO! Obvious. [/spoiler]rnrnPerò..rnrnSono Almost the same age (the Nikon presented at the end of 2014, Sony in mid-2015), both of which are about to be replaced with the new generation (as they like to say that all "is the best ever" .. and would like to answer "thanks to ..."). Then what? is still investing on the old reflex system, or you risk the longer wheelbase of the leg with the new technology? rnrnVediamo a little step by step. I have used for a report to a wedding, and these are my impressioni.rnrnhttp: //www.danardi.net/public/blog/foto/tecnica/con-specchio-o-senza-specchio-reflex-vs-mirrorless-d750-vs-a7r2-per-la-fotografia/2016/12/ sent on January 29, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
