|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Next27 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Next27  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 Pros: The true essence of m4 / 3 Cons: Nobody Opinion: If you had to ask me which optics more than any other has appreciated of this system the answer would be obvious: Panasonic 35-100 2.8. 10cm 350gr 70-200eq f2.8 fixed (pdc double rapportata to FF) stabilized tropicalized blurred wonderful AF precise fast and quiet I have to say anything else? I use it both for portraits and in landscaping and it never disappoints. Mounted on oly EM1 it behaves very well perfectly balanced and imposed the priority on the stabilization of the lens that in particular from 80mm up a wire works better than that of the camera body. If I had to find a defect I would say the wheeled ferrule, comfortable when it's cold since it does not become icy like the one in metal oly, but also catches a lot of dust. Also my sample is perfect but I have seen several ruined on the barrel in the lower part or discolored so I think they are delicate from this point of view. That said to find something wrong I had to commit, the 35-100 2.8 100% embodies the philosophy of m4 / 3 and takes the system on another level with regard to weight and size. I advisewithout reserve it will never disappoint you. At the moment it is a fixed pair with the 8-18 panale and they form a deadly combination. sent on January 09, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 Pros: Compact, resistance to flare, sharpness Cons: Ugly, plastic and with the release button really annoying (but it is the price to pay for a 18-35eq in 5cm), the usual lens hood sold separately Opinion: There is no doubt .. if you look compact this little Zuiko will surprise you, but you already know this just read the technical data to understand how little space they managed to put a 18-35eq, focal lengths that do not allow such small size. The defects in my view are the construction, and I wonder why they have not renewed in aesthetics as they would sell to wagon if only the barrel was PRO style. The sharpness at the edges is not exceptional especially at 9mm but not as disastrous as we read around. Having said that, let's move on to the advantages, light and compact, 52mm small and inexpensive filters, resistance to the scary flare (now I have the pana 8-18 and if the dream) sharpness in the center excellent and very beautiful colors. For those who embrace the idea of ??m4 / 3 to save weight and encumbrance, perhaps combined with some fixed on the upper focal length is definitely an excellent travel companion. Obvious considerations ... at 9mm we are at f4 and it's okay since we will often use it between f4 and f5.6 at 18mm we go to f5.6 and considering the pdc double del m4 / 3 you will almost always have everything in focus, so I suggest you combine a fixed 15/17/20/25 for when you want more brightness or less Pdc. sent on January 08, 2018 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: All Cons: Paraluce sold separately at crazy prices Opinion: You can not find faults in an optic that costs so little and makes so much. Very light and even if plastic (metal attack) very well built. From what I've seen the black version holds up better over time. Classic portrait lens excellent already at TA and considering the double Pc of the m4 / 3 you will hardly have an eye on fire and the other not. I compared it with the 12-40 to 40mm and ... there is no history I'm sorry the 45 wins big. For the price / weight / yield that you should not miss in any kit of an m4 / 3ista. Blurry nice, sharpness right (in the portraits better not to have too much), Af always ready. Take it with your eyes closed you will not regret it. sent on January 08, 2018 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II ASPH Pros: Compact, clear, light, construction Cons: AF especially in low light and noisy Opinion: I had this lens for a few months and, provided that I have not found the focal point, I must say that if you want a compact quality in the world m4 / 3 you can not make better choice. Really tiny and very light perfect in combination with a small body (Pen, pana gx80 etc ...). I also tried it on the EM1 and it ends up flush with the handle. Excellent construction, only the MF ring did not shine. Optical output as opposed to the other much more surgical panasonic. Sharp already at TA. AF beyond that it is not very fast, but on this focal length it does not count much, it is a bit noisy because the front element when focheggia makes forward / backward. Diaframmato goes even better reaching the maximum around F4 and closing a little more (careful not to go into diffraction) you get beautiful starry light points. Overall a good optics that I recommend in combination with small bodies to have a compact of all respect. sent on January 08, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
