|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Leonardo Manetti www.juzaphoto.com/p/LeonardoManetti |
Nikon AF-S 600mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Sharpness, autofocus, construction, detail all the openings Cons: Weight and size, pdc reduced distance maf to 5m Opinion: Butilizzo freehand must have a certain physical presence even if you are helped by a good weight distribution and great stabilizer. The building is amazing, a real tank, the top. sent on June 18, 2015 |
Nikon Coolpix P300 Pros: Objective bright, excellent sharpness, flash potenternper be that of a compact, compact. Cons: Can not shoot in raw Opinion: Uutilizzata promotion in the summer of 2011 with the d7000, the p300 has un'obiettio very bright well stabilized that helps a lot in low-light situations allowing lower ISO values. The quality of the frame is very good thanks to 12mpx sensor. The flash albeit modest in size is very powerful in relation to the size. The only drawback is the fact that you can only shoot in jpeg and not raw.rnrn sent on March 18, 2013 |
Nikon D7000 Pros: Yield at high ISO, great sensor, dual memory slot, good layout of controls, af fast and accurate, very solid. Cons: Maybe flurry of "only" 6fps for the rest there are none. Opinion: I have this camera for almost two years after moving from d3000. The iso are good up to 2000 up to 6400 and discreet, the controls are well placed and easy to reach, body and 'very ergonomic, autofocus 39 points and' precise and fast, dual-slot for the sd card and ' really handy even if it 'for sd and not the CF, I think the only flaw is the "only" 6 fps. Honestly 7 or 8 fps with the battery grip they would not have done male.rn sent on March 16, 2013 |
Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4 G Pros: Bright, crystal clear, excellent cstruzione, blurred excellent, very light Cons: Af not fast, slightly soft at F1.4 Opinion: I possess this light for over a year and I'm very satisfied. Used almost exclusively on the right (d7000 and D3000) performs very well especially with regard to the sharpness that is very good to excellent and F1.8 to F2.8. Used in any situation has always behaved very well; even in the sport despite the lightning it was not af 'behaved well. Obviously it performs equally well on fx. sent on March 11, 2013 |
Nikon AF-S 200-400mm f/4 G ED VR II Pros: Excellent quality, solid construction, very little vignetting and precise autofocus. Cons: Very high cost Opinion: For me, the 200-400 and 'superb optics. It may be a good alternative for those who do not want a fixed lens with a quality that has nothing to envy to the 300 f2.8 duplicato.Consigliabile use on tripod or monopod although you can use a free hand thanks to the excellent stabilizer. The autofocus and 'very accurate although a little slow on occasion if you do not use the limiter. Compared to other objectives, the 200-400 to the maximum focal maintains the same quality as the minimum focal length. Great when paired with the 1.4 tc with tc enough 1,7.Consigliatissimo !!! sent on May 09, 2012 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me