|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Andrea 240879 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Andrea240879  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Clarity, cost, focal aperture. Cons: Af noisy, purple chromatic aberration, Opinion: I love the 35 DX, it is my favorite goal. With him you can shoot in low light conditions, thanks to the opening 1.8. I took pictures to objects almost in darkness where the colors were reproduced in an excellent manner, and the photos are beautiful day with bright colors. It can also be used for video, although the A.F. Continuous is noisy and should set it to manual, but set to 1.8 in a room lit only by a bedside lamp sharpness is impressionante.rnA Sometimes you see purple chromatic aberrations that can be removed with camera raw. Pull the sums ... rn (Low expenditure - so yield) sent on February 26, 2017 |
 | Nikon D3300 Pros: Great sensor, image quality, ISO up to good rn1600 / 3200, excellent Raw. Cons: Very few. It is the best of this price range, but if I find some, I would say: the body slightly ergonomic machine for my hands, af perform poorly, and a few buttons. Opinion: After about 4 months of use I can give you a more accurate opinion. RNLA D3300 is an excellent aps-c, the counter described above are normal for the price range, but I can assure you end up here. It also plays a reflex of the higher-end competition, just go DxOMark and make the sensor compared with that of the other. His Sony sensor has an excellent sharpness and dynamic range, although much color tends "cold" but it is not a problem. The B are great, it retrieves it, although a little less in underexposed images, also the whites depart a bit too much. jpg are excellent up to ISO 800, it starts to drop to 1600 but the noise is barely perceptible and can be used even for large prints, while in 3200 the noise is more evident, if only luminance, but you can safely use this sensitivity "standard" for prints. The 6400/12800 is better not to use them, because the noise is heavy (it takes a FX), but maybe if you expose a well ismpa little you can do. 25000 are only for the "marketing" because they are devastated by the noise. sent on January 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF-S 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Pros: zoom range, construction, f.8 / 11 sharpness. Cons: Nothing particular, maybe little brightness (but a handyman) and stabilizer a little noisy ... a little sticker '. Opinion: I got back to 260 € after I sent back a Tamron 18 200 vc to problems with the stabilizer, sharpness and colors that I did not like. rnrnQuesto 18,140 is a good handyman perhaps dim. rnHa excellent sharpness at all focal lengths, but in particular between 50 and 100 mm in f.8 /f.11 and with a hoya Skylight 67mm front, that little bit extra. The mounted above my D3300, someone goes in saying modesta.Sicuramente is not high end, but it happens its Sony sensor holds well up to ISO 3200, asphalting machines also type "canon" higher end sent on January 17, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
